My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-08-17 Leeward Exh B (AMEND SPP 07-000044)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2017
>
2017-08-17 Leeward Exh B (AMEND SPP 07-000044)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2017 3:49:19 PM
Creation date
9/25/2017 3:49:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />GARSON: Yes, and yes. <br /> <br />UNGER: Thank you. Are there any members of the public here to testify on this agenda item? <br />Seeing none, I need a motion to close public hearing. <br /> <br />NOBRIGA: I so move. <br /> <br />KAHOLO: Second. <br /> <br />UNGER: Motion by Commissioner Nobriga, second by Commissioner Kaholo. All in favor? <br /> <br />COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br /> <br />UNGER: Oppose? \[None.\] Motion carries. Public hearing testimony is closed. I would ask for a <br />motion. <br /> <br />CARR SMITH: Chair Unger, I’d like to make a motion to approve, the application to amend Special <br />Permit 07-44 be approved based on the Planning Director’s findings, recommendation and proposed <br />amended conditions, which includes the two items that the Department had discussed in their <br />presentation, and which shall be adopted. <br /> <br />KEALOHA: Second. <br /> <br />UNGER: We have a motion by Commissioner Carr Smith, second by Commissioner Kealoha. The <br />floor is open for discussion. Christian, can you, since the motion is part of your changes that you <br />made, can you please review those for us so we can add them officially to the motion? <br /> <br />KAY: Sure. The changes, the first change to be made is just a change in the background and <br />recommendation report where it reads “SIHP 21837,” pardon me, where it reads “Preservation Site <br />S-15” should actually read “S-31,” and that’s just a matter of changing the record for clarity. And <br />then in terms of the actual condition itself, there is a change to Condition Number 2, second sentence; <br />that should read, “Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy, the applicant, successors or assigns <br />shall,” etc. <br /> <br />UNGER: Great. Would you like to rephrase your motion? <br /> <br />CARR SMITH: Sure. Tell me exactly where the — <br /> <br />KAY: Sure, the changes for the, the archaeological site are on Page 5 in the background and Page 7 <br />in the recommendation. Page 7 in the recommendation right above number, pardon me, about five <br />lines down, six lines down. <br /> <br />CARR SMITH: And that’s changed from 21837 to? <br /> <br />KAY: Pardon me, it should read instead of “S-15,” it should read “S-31.” <br />7 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.