|
support from landowners, leaseholders. And, before we start spending money for design and
<br /> construction of a district entry feature, I know that there's a wide range of views on how that
<br /> place should ultimately look like. So, I don't know if we should invest money early on when we
<br /> don't really have a view what the long-range view would be.
<br /> So, anyway, those are some of my thoughts, but I'm really concerned that we, as we're in this
<br /> General Plan amendment, that we really pin down the changes that they are consensus for
<br /> changing. Something like the commercial areas that have been identified, I think we should try
<br /> to codify that to avoid that becoming an issue in the future.
<br /> Anybody want—Sig, you want to, have any questions?
<br /> ZANE: You're good.
<br /> DELIMA: Okay, well, the best I can. Okay, so I don't have any more questions. We can
<br /> maybeI think that would be the end of our meeting so to speak.
<br /> MEAD: Yeah, that would, that can conclude this, and again, this is, you know, under those
<br /> opportunities that we were just exploring. You know, those are really what I see as being, or
<br /> probably what we see as being some of those, the engagement there, and so I'm happy to work
<br /> with you in the future on building an agenda that can accomplish some of these, the identified
<br /> things, moving forward. Especially when we have a quorum.
<br /> DELIMA: Well, I would like to indicate that the members that are not present were absent and,
<br /> are absent and excused from today's meeting for a variety of reasons, and, again, I would like to
<br /> apologize to the members of the public that are here because we don't have a quorum. We
<br /> cannot deliberate. We cannot take action. But, frankly, at this point, we really need to take a
<br /> step back, engage in what was adopted, and see how we can refine and build some collaborative
<br /> action plans that the administration, landowners can support as we do not have the necessary
<br /> funds to move aggressively with an environmental assessment in order to attract capital
<br /> investment on the peninsula.
<br /> So, with that, since we do not have a quorum, we will adjourn the meeting, and thank you all for
<br /> coming, and the minutes of this meeting will be provided to the rest of the Agency members at
<br /> the next meeting. Okay, thank you very much. We stand adjourned.
<br /> The discussion ended at 2:27 p.m.
<br /> ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
<br /> 1. Approval of Minutes from the February 22, 2017, Banyan Drive Hawaii Redevelopment
<br /> Agency meeting.
<br /> The Agency did not take this matter up due to the lack of quorum.
<br /> Page 7 of 8
<br /> Banyan Drive Hawaii Redevelopment Agency
<br /> May 31,2017 Minutes
<br />
|