My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
08-07-17 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2017
>
08-07-17 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2017 3:57:27 PM
Creation date
10/23/2017 3:57:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> Mr. Goodenow: I think the appropriate motion to make would be to start...to <br /> dismiss or...you know a main motion and then if someone wants <br /> to continue we can make a secondary motion...so for the purpose <br /> of discussion I'm going to make a motion that we do not accept it <br /> based on...the allegations that Mr. Hyland is not here to <br /> supplement his petition and.... <br /> Mr. Murai: Well... <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: That's not. <br /> Mr. Murai: Board member Goodenow...I'm not sure whether your rules <br /> require supplementing of a petition. General speaking the way I <br /> look at your rules...the petition should be able to stand on its own. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Right and I'm saying...we're saying it is and in addition he's not <br /> here to supplement it. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Mr. Goodenow first of all you need to turn on your mic but be <br /> recognized before....please. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Sony. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Before you speak...so the thing is when we talk about the rejection <br /> of a request which is kind of what I'm hearing...then we got to <br /> follow 4.5 of the rules and I would say if it's a...it would be <br /> (b)...the request either one...the request is speculative or purely <br /> hypothetical and does not involve an actually situation or number <br /> two which is the request is frivolous or number three the request <br /> does not substantially comply with the requirements set out above. <br /> So if somebody wants to make a motion in terms of rejecting the <br /> request based on one of those or any other...but it needs to be...so <br /> 4.5 (b)(1)(2) I would say is a possibility. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Could you read it one more time Madame Chair. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Sure...in 4.5(b)(1) it says that the request is speculative or purely <br /> hypothetical and does not involve an actual situation or (b)(2) <br /> would be the request is frivolous...if those are reasons then we can <br /> use those particular reasons to reject the request. <br /> Mr. Adams: I'm kind of lost...do we have a motion and a second? <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: No. We're still looking for a motion...but the motion that was <br /> made when we say we're gonna reject the request...we can reject it <br /> based on the fact that the petitioner is not present...that's not a <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.