My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-10-05 Hearing Transcript - Hawaii Johns SPP 09-082
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2017
>
2017-10-05 Hearing Transcript - Hawaii Johns SPP 09-082
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2017 2:42:38 PM
Creation date
11/2/2017 2:42:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
want to come back in 2022 for more time, they'd have to come back to the Planning <br />Commission. <br />That's my presentation. I'm happy to answer any questions that the Commission may have. <br />HENKEL: Any questions of staff from the Commission? Thank you. <br />KAY: Thank you. <br />HENKEL: Then will, will the representative and/or the Applicant please come forward? <br />KERN: Good morning. <br />HENKEL: Good morning. Will you raise your right hands? Do you swear or affirm to tell the <br />truth on this matter before the Planning Commission? <br />KERN/CUMMINGS: Yes. <br />HENKEL: All right. Thank you. State your name and proceed. <br />KERN: Good morning, Mr. Chair. I'm Zendo Kern. I'm the planning consultant. To my right <br />here is John Cummings, the Applicant. Good morning, Mr. Chair, Members of the Planning <br />Commission, Mr. Director, Corporation Counsel, and all the wonderful staff on the Planning <br />Department. There's a Iota lot of hard work here. <br />This is a bit of aobviously a bit of a tricky one. You're probably going to ask me if we <br />reviewed the Recommendation and conditions, which we have reviewed the Recommendation <br />and conditions. At this point, we're not comfortable with accepting them as they are. For the <br />most part, the conditions themselves are fine except for the timeframe of it. We realize that the <br />request came in to allow the operation to happen indefinitely. We're open to a conversation of, <br />of what that would do or potentially a longer timeframe. <br />This is a tricky situation obviously because of the nature of the land. If the land wasn't <br />considered prime, it'd probably be a much different conversation we have here. I had the <br />opportunity to sit on the Planning Commission during this original application and saw the <br />process what happened there, what it went through. <br />I think something that is extremely important that I'd like everybody to consider is what this <br />does. So, this is on prime ag land, right? And, we want to preserve prime ag land. And, so, with <br />this operation, what we have is, we have four acres. Part of it is in pasture, so it's being used as <br />agricultural. It's being used ag. We have a home that the family lives in. The family lives there, <br />and they operate out of a portion of it as the office for their business. The Applicant does not <br />advertise on the site. There's no signs. As Christian had mentioned, they drove past it. The <br />Applicant does not have customers coming over. It's not a place where it's like, you know, <br />commercial operations where customers are coming over. They deal with the customers out in <br />the field or by the phone. So, traffic is pretty much none. It's just what they do. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.