My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-09-19 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Kailua Village Design Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2024
>
2017
>
2017-09-19 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 9:57:55 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 9:57:53 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Applicant: Fritz Harris-Glade, AIA, LEED AP <br />Landowner: Circadia Management LLC c/o Mr. Han Kim <br />TMK: (3) 7-5-004: 006 <br />Location: No street address has been assigned. <br /> <br />The Commission took up this item at 5:18 p.m. <br /> <br />Chairman Dahlberg noted that the applicant had further modified the revised design that had been <br />distributed to the Commissioners earlier, and that a copy of the final proposal was available to the <br />public. <br /> <br />Mr. Dunlap displayed some site photographs, and gave a PowerPoint presentation of the <br />applicant’s submittal. He highlighted changes that had been made since the Commission’s review <br />of his original submittal at the August 15, 2017, meeting, which included the placement of the <br />hotel wings at an angle so as to mitigate adverse impact on the view from Henry Street, as well as <br />a ten-foot height difference from one wing to another. <br /> <br />The applicant, Fritz Harris-Glade, provided additional information, and stated that not only would <br />the new orientation of the building protect the makai view but also give more privacy to the <br />neighbors along the southern border. He displayed a three-dimensional model of the site and <br />building to show the topography and architectural features. He also presented a copy of an <br />approved burial plan, which had been requested by the Commission at the previous meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Harris-Glade clarified the proposed colors depicted on Sheet A-5.1, as the photocopy did not <br />show the true intended colors. He also displayed a sample of four different green colors for the <br />roof, and said that the lighter green was shown on the drawings. Commissioner Van Pernis <br />suggested that cream or almond be considered for the trim, doors and windows, rather than white. <br />Mr. Harris-Glade responded that he was open to suggestions from the Commissioners. <br />Commissioner Roth expressed his approval for the roof color change from brown to light green <br />because there was a lot of brown on the walls. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ikeuchi asked if the view of the Moku‘aikaua Church spire would be maintained. <br />Mr. Harris-Glade responded that that would be dependent upon the location of the viewer. In <br />response to Commissioners Ikeuchi and Roth’s questions, Mr. Harris-Glade stated that a traffic <br />impact study had already been done at the time of the zoning change, and that as a result a traffic <br />lights had been installed, which would be activated at the project completion. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ikeuchi commented that aside from addition of palm trees, she still found the <br />Kailua Village feel lacking from the proposed design. Mr. Harris-Glade responded that it was <br />difficult to make such a large hotel project into a small village style while having to maintain the <br />more contemporary corporate brand image. Commissioner Roth said that he was pleased with the <br />revised design, notably the much improved roofline and a lot of articulation on the walls that <br />would create desired shadows, as well as the building being positioned such a way that it would <br />not look so massive. Further, he thanked the applicant for addressing the Commission’s concerns <br />that had been raised at the previous meeting, and commented that the three-dimensional model <br />with the architectural details was helpful. Commissioner Sullenberger agreed that the revised <br />design presented much improvement, in particular, the zigzag design of the building that <br />eliminated the in-your-face effect of the previous straight wall. He added that he was ready to <br />support the application. Commissioner Van Pernis also said that he was ready to make a motion <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.