Laserfiche WebLink
Department seeks community input to discuss which specific items would be appropriate to <br />uplift/promote to the General Plan. A benefit of this strategy would include increased consistency <br />between the General Plan and the CDPs which could improve policy implementation island -wide. This <br />will also allow subsequently updated CDPs to have an increased focus on the issues which directly and <br />uniquely impact their region <br />Several of the Action Committee members raised concern for a lack of specific examples in the <br />presentation. In the process of gaining an understanding of the general strategy of the updated <br />General Plan's structure, they hoped to be provided a draft document for revisal prior to the beginning <br />of the adoption process. Planning staff explained their current status on the project which has involved <br />gathering the preliminary pieces and that there is no existing draft in progress to share at that time; <br />they also explained their intent on ensuring that the Action Committee understands the drafting <br />strategy in the meantime. The Action Committee members requested a matrix of the Kona CDP <br />policies showing their relationship to the policies in the General Plan in order to gain transparency on <br />which policies may be effected by this new strategy. <br />The Action Committee sought to encourage more collaboration with the Planning Department in the <br />process of drafting the new General Plan and expressed an overall concern of being informed of <br />changes "after the fact." An Action Committee member asked for general "themes" to have an idea of <br />what will be covered in this next General Plan in order to understand how that would affect the Kona <br />CDP in the future. In absence of having any prepared themes to share with the Action Committee, staff <br />identified a few potential examples including: containing urbanization, improved quality of life, <br />retaining open space, preserving agricultural potential, preserving cultural assets, and recognizing <br />natural hazards. <br />In response to some perception that the General Plan Update process was inappropriately "top down" <br />instead of driven from regional communities, Planning staff explained that the Department -led process <br />has included outreach events prior to and in the early stages of the update process, including <br />introducing the proposed update plan to all Action Committees and soliciting public input. Suggestions <br />have been and are being taken into consideration as the Department has moved forward into <br />designing the form and content of the updated General Plan. Staff added that these recent public <br />presentations to the Action Committees about the update process and formative thinking have been <br />made with the intention of getting the Action Committees' community-based input at every major step <br />of Plan development. <br />Other topics of discussion included: the timeline of the General Plan update in relation to the future <br />updates of the Kona CDP, and ensuring that this process allows future input to be included; tracking <br />previously completed projects; seeking community input on any conflicting CDP and General Plan <br />policies; maintaining an increased level of community outreach and transparency; and requests to <br />include the following topics into the General Plan update: smart growth principles, road standards, and <br />means to coordinate with large businesses/organizations on the island. <br />The presentation slides that were displaying during this agenda item can be viewed and downloaded from the following <br />website: http://records.co.hawaii.hi.us/weblink/1/doc/89784/Pagel.aspx <br />2. Communication no. 2017-02 CIP Recommendation Letter: <br />Committee member Payne moved to approve sending the letter. Seconded by Committee member <br />David. The motion to send the letter passed with 8 votes aye and 0 votes nay. <br />www.hiplannin,-dept.com kont0hawaiicounty.-ov Page 2 <br />