Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Kahakalau: Is informed and then if they both agree you know then it dies sort <br /> of thing where as if there is a question and or an uncertainty then <br /> you know it would be the Chair's purview to put it on the agenda <br /> anyway...it could go then into an executive session <br /> questioning...discussion with our counsel in regards to the merit of <br /> it etc....rather than it be officially agendized as a petition right I <br /> mean that would could be a possibility. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: I suppose someone who's aggrieved by your decision right could <br /> still come to a meeting even though it's not on the agenda during <br /> public testimony could say hey I filed this and it's not being heard <br /> if they wanted too. <br /> Mr. Adams: I'm not sure that they could currently. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Well it's not on the...right. <br /> Mr. Adams: If it's not on the agenda I don't know that your public testimony is <br /> allowable. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: The same...there is the Sunshine Law case law...I mean it's up to <br /> the Chair to allow it or not but there's case law that they could talk <br /> about anything pretty much. <br /> Mr. Adams: Okay. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: As long you know it's.... <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: So far our practice has been that when there is a statement from the <br /> public that we ask what agenda item they're speaking to but that <br /> could be something that could be added into the rules as well <br /> right... <br /> Mr. Adams: Sure. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: You're saying that...the public...because we're talking three <br /> minutes you know so if there is something that the public feels <br /> very strongly about and it's not on our agenda for whatever <br /> reason...that they do have that opportunity to you know have their <br /> three minutes of... <br /> Mr. Adams: Sure. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Stating their concerns. <br /> Mr. Adams: Okay. Clearing of the air opportunity... <br /> 15 <br />