My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-08-22 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2017
>
2017-08-22 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2017 12:21:11 PM
Creation date
12/4/2017 12:21:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – August 22, 2017 <br />MH: To answer Ike’s question - In the interest of the public, it’s usually – you guys <br />could vote for a 2/3 vote but I would suggest against that because if there’s <br />people that want to come – other hunters that want to hear about that and <br />especially if it’s gonna be informational in the sense of maps and such – then <br />I would encourage putting it on the next agenda so that the public can have <br />notice of it. <br /> <br />\[Discussion\] <br /> <br />DY: Yeah, for my edification – can you tell us what the requirements are? <br /> <br />MH: To put something on the agenda? <br /> <br />DY: Yes. <br /> <br />MH: At the meeting, you would have to have a 2/3 vote of the commissioners <br />present to have a quorum. <br /> <br />KS: Status update for the HCP – November 20, 2015, is when the HCP went to <br />public review – we came and presented here at that time – Edith and myself – <br />in January 2016 the environmental assessment that has to accompany the <br />HCP went for public review as well. So the HCP public review is about a 5 <br />month public review cause it’s a large document and the EA was only a 30 <br />day public review. From April 2016 until now, we’ve been trying to address <br />the public comments. We didn’t have a lot of comments on either the HCP or <br />the EA but most – not all – the vast majority of the comments were <br />supportive, which was good. There were a couple of comments that were <br />made that we thought we needed to spend a little more time to address – I <br />think Jim Cogswell – our State Wildlife Manager came and kinda caught us all <br />by surprise saying that we were going to do an EIS which was after <br />discussing it with him – that’s not how we decided to go – not an EIS – so we <br />decided to do a revised environmental assessment. So we’re basically <br />amending the EA that we already did. The amendment is to include game <br />mammal management. It wasn’t in the EA at first and so we’re now including <br />it. We also made some changes – not much – some small changes to the <br />HCP based on comments. So the HCP went back or just earlier last week we <br />sent the draft of the HCP to the Endangered Species Recovery Committee <br />(ESRC) so they have a month to review it before we’re on their agenda on <br />September 14 so Edith and myself and others from DOFAW will be at the <br />ESRC to discuss the HCP with them. We anticipate – so the HCP has to be <br />approved by the ESRC before the board can see it and then the board can <br />review it and make their decisions based on our comments and the ESRC’s <br />comments. We are drafting a scope of work for that environmental <br />assessment – the revisions of the environmental assessment right now – we <br />hope to have something out in the next couple of weeks to get contractors to <br />bid on it – and hopefully, by the end of the year – beginning of next year – we <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.