Laserfiche WebLink
Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – November 8, 2017 <br />TL: That’s what I’m talking about is a home range... That’s what published <br />\[unclear\]. <br /> <br />KS: Home ranges are not necessarily a circle – so we’ve done some radio <br />collaring – we did some on Oahu and we were seeing patterns in the <br />movement – it wasn’t just a complete like whatever one mile circle it was – <br />they usually had patterns and they were going to particular places and <br />utilizing particular resources – they actually have a nice study going right now <br />with the University of Hawaii and they’re doing a lot of home range and, you <br />know, telemetry and GPS collaring and looking at home ranges animals. So <br />that’s what we’d like to do is look at these animals – see where they’re <br />moving – see how they’re utilizing habitat and try to get an idea of the types <br />or areas that they’re using. <br /> <br />TL: When you talk about utilizing habitat are you guys doing rumen studies? <br /> <br />KS: I don’t think so... <br /> <br />TL: How would you know what they’re doing to the habitat then if you don’t know <br />what they’re eating? <br /> <br />KS: Cause you can see it. <br /> <br />TL: OK. It’s interesting you say that because a rumen study that I have seen that <br />was done by the University of Hawaii shows that about 10% of the animals <br />rumen – maybe on one or two animals there was 20 or 30%. But by and large <br />it was like 10 or 12% was the actual content of native grasses and leaves. <br />We’re hoping to have Colin Onaka who was a part of that study talk to us last <br />meeting and hopefully maybe the next meeting to explain exactly what this <br />rumen study was. But if you look at that Malia Kipapa study it seems pretty <br />thorough done by the University. It doesn’t show an awful lot of emphasis on <br />native by those animals and yet we still hear that these animals are gravitate <br />towards native – endangered plants and DLNR should probably try to correct <br />that statement because it doesn’t seem to be true. <br /> <br />KS: There’s lots of studies of impact of animals on vegetation and that’s what <br />we’re looking at – what’s left behind – we don’t need to do a rumen – I’ve <br />done stomach contents – I know how fast things degrade – that’s not an <br />accurate way to figure out what something’s eating and what we do is we look <br />at an area with animals and look at an area with no animals – that’ll tell you <br />what the difference it. <br /> \[Discussion\] <br />NP: Yeah, but animals do travel when they can they migrate. They might move <br />through an area – if they’re allowed to keep moving those plants might <br />actually be happier in a few months because they’ve been pruned. Everything <br />just doubly sprouts when it’s been pruned – if those animals are allowed to <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />