Laserfiche WebLink
HENKEL: —Jeff, excuse me. Let's let the Leeward guys get in position to see your <br />presentation and then just give them a minute, please. <br />DARROW: I just want to say thank you for your patience. This is, this is a test case to see if we <br />can actually be able to do this Joint Commission in the different Council Chambers. So, thank <br />you for your patience as we try to resolve the issues. We're learning of a number of issues that <br />we're going to have to try to address. One of them obviously being the PowerPoint as well as <br />being able to effectively get communication back and forth of submittals that come in on the <br />different sides. So, as we go through this process, we'll see if this works or if we're going to <br />have to just meet together in one location. Thank you. <br />They all good? Okay. I'll begin the presentation again. This is review and action of our <br />proposed amendments to Planning Commission Rule 9 regarding the Special Management Area. <br />The proposed amendments to Planning Commission Rule 9 include changes made by Act 153, <br />which amended Chapter 176 and Chapter 205A in the Hawaii Revised Statutes, regarding the <br />Special Management Area. <br />The proposed amendments to Rule 9 relating to Act 153 seek to number one, exempt the State <br />Department of Boating and Ocean Recreational [sic] from any SMA permit. Number two, to <br />amend the definition of single-family dwelling as an exempt class of action. And, number three, <br />increase the valuation of improvements that could be considered for an SMA Minor Permit <br />versus requiring an SMA Use Permit. <br />Additional changes we'll be looking at that are proposed to Rule 9 include the following. <br />Addition, added language for retroactive approvals and determinations. Add clarification to the <br />authority section. Amend the SMA assessment section to include a filing fee for the SMA <br />assessment application. A standard review and acceptance time as well as add additional time to <br />act on the assessment application, and amend the short form assessment application section. <br />Lastly, there is a proposal to amend the SMA Use Permit section that currentlyoh, including <br />the assessment section—that currently allows the Planning Director to waive the submittal of a <br />shoreline survey for a SMA Use Permit application and assessment application when the parcel <br />abuts the shoreline. <br />I'd like to just interject here. In preparation of the rules, there are times that we miss a particular <br />section that we're trying to amend. Normally, there are several areas in a section in the rule that <br />we try to amend at the same time. One of the sections that we miss through this was under the <br />assessment application regarding this waiver. It would be the identical language that we're <br />requesting in the SMA Use Permit section, and we'll address that as we get to it. <br />The proposed amendments to Planning Commission Rule 9 resulting from changes made by <br />Act 153, which amended Chapter 205A-22, HRS, by defining that "development" does not <br />include the following. Construction or reconstruction of a single-family residence that is less <br />than seven hundred [sic] seven thousand five hundred square feet of floor area and is [sic -is not] <br />EXHIBIT A <br />21 <br />