My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-10-30 Hearing Transcript - Amendments to PC Rule 9 (Joint Meeting)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2017
>
2017-10-30 Hearing Transcript - Amendments to PC Rule 9 (Joint Meeting)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2018 3:27:01 PM
Creation date
1/4/2018 3:26:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CLARKSON: I don't have any big disagreement with that definition of floor area, but it would <br />be nice if they were, it was congruent with other departments. <br />HENKEL: Any other questions from Windward? Okay, I'll throw it over to Leeward. <br />CARR SMITH: Yes, this is Nancy Carr Smith on this side. I just had a quick question, just <br />wanted to confirm. So, all front porches, balconies, lanais, anything covered or uncovered <br />without surrounding walls are not included in square footage. Is that correct? <br />DARROW: That's—if you had a lanai that was covered, and it was a large lanai, that would be <br />considered. We would look at the floor area of that lanai as part of that. That would be in the <br />second portion of this definition that says the floor area of a building or portion thereof not <br />provided with surrounding exterior walls shall be the usable area under the horizontal projection <br />of the roof or floor area. So, normally, the usable area would be a lanai. It would not usually <br />involve the roof overhangs. <br />HENKEL: Any other questions from Leeward? <br />CHURCH: This is Commissioner Church again. I find it interesting the point that was made in <br />testimony about change orders and their effect on square footages. And, I wondered, I'm not <br />even sure if it's appropriate the Planning Department to police that those change orders go <br />through the Building Department. And, but I wondered if indirectly somehow that can be <br />incorporated or it's just left silent. <br />DARROW: Theif, any type of change order that would go through an amendment to a <br />building permit would come through our office, and at that point, we would be reviewing that as <br />part of the original request. There's, to be honest with you, we haven't, there was a testifier that <br />mentioned that people were going to come in with a dwelling that was 7,499 square feet. We <br />haven't had too many submittals since this law was changed that are that close, that we've had an <br />issue. There was one that I recall, but other than that, I don't recall any. And, because that was <br />such an issue with that one particular application, the staff as well as the Planning Division is <br />fully aware of that fine line regarding that. <br />But, as far as anything within this amendment, I don't think we have anything specifically to <br />address that. <br />HENKEL: Any other comments from Leeward? <br />KAY: No, Mr. Chair. <br />HENKEL: Go ahead, Jeff <br />DARROW: Thank you. Continuing on, additionally, Act 153 amended the definition of Special <br />Management Area Minor Permit and Special Management Area Use Permit in Chapter 205A-22, <br />HRS, as follows. Special Management Area Minor Permit means an action by the authority <br />EXHIBIT A <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.