My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-10-25 BDHRA Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Banyan Drive HRA
>
Minutes
>
2017
>
2017-10-25 BDHRA Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2018 3:46:19 PM
Creation date
1/23/2018 3:46:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
identified under Chapter 53. And that would actually be vetting this through the Environmental <br /> Impact Statement process, Chapter 343 of Hawaii Revised Statutes. The Environmental Impact <br /> Statement is a very comprehensive process, it vets the plans with stakeholders, it gets input from <br /> various parties and it explores alternative scenarios to the proposal. So we identified this really <br /> as this conceptual land use master plan; again this is just a conversation starter on developing a <br /> master plan and vetting it thoroughly and comprehensively with interested stakeholders. <br /> Another next step that the BDHRA identified with the Planning Department is really how do we <br /> fund this; this does not come cheaply so we really need to identify where funding is going to <br /> come from to start to move this plan forward. <br /> So at the end of last year, or essentially the end of last year, that was really the last actions that <br /> BDHRA had with respect with the conceptual master plan, identifying the need for the EIS as <br /> being the next step. During this past year, there was multiple legislation that was brought forth <br /> regarding, or that would have dealt with, properties in the BDHRA's redevelopment area. <br /> There's eight bills that were brought forth, and a lot of them dealt with Chapter 171 which is <br /> State Land Use law, and one of them dealt with the Hawaii Community Development Authority <br /> under HRS 206A. These bills, they're all multiple bills, some of them dealt with varying degrees <br /> of redevelopment of specifically of Banyan Drive or other State-owned properties. One was <br /> successful, HB-575 moved forward without the Governor's signature, became law but what <br /> really impacted us was amendment of Chapter 717, again State Land Use law, but it dealt with <br /> commercial and industrial leases. So in terms of Banyan Drive, it really did not have an impact <br /> since Banyan Drive is resort, the State Land Use is resort over there. So again, it is worth noting <br /> though that these were brought forth in the biennium, so these bills do not have to be <br /> reintroduced, they can be entertained in this upcoming 2018 legislative session. During this <br /> time, again, the Planning Department really acted on behalf of the Banyan Drive Redevelopment <br /> Agency, namely in the commenting on draft legislation. So for all of these eight bills that came <br /> through, the Planning Department, on behalf of the BDHRA, was advocating for involvement of <br /> BDHRA in any of these redevelopment actions, keeping the process also tied to the local level <br /> here. Planning Department also commented on DLNR's lease proposals and permits for State- <br /> owned Banyan Drive properties, namely the lease proposal that came forth for Uncle Billy's and <br /> two month-to-month revocable permits for both Country Club Condominiums and the Reed's <br /> Bay Hotel. Again these were actions that the Planning Department took on behalf of the <br /> BDHRA. And this is really where we're at right now, identifying, you know, kind of funding to <br /> move the master plan forward and identifying the upcoming legislative session and the numerous <br /> bills that still have the chance to be considered. We brought forth, or we called this meeting <br /> today and we provided everyone with a advanced copy of some of these topics for discussion. <br /> And with that, I think, leaving these questions up here, these general questions up here, I think <br /> we can kind of open up the floor to that discussion. <br /> DELIMA: Well, I appreciate the overview. And I want to welcome Representative Nakashima <br /> here this afternoon. (Arrived at 2:19 p.m.) Appreciate you joining us. At the last Banyan Drive <br /> Hawaii Redevelopment Agency meeting, we had a discussion about what if we're just totally <br /> dependent on funding, then that might be a, might be a problem. And as much as there was, <br /> there is no monies to do the type of EIS or that would be conducted in order to facilitate capital <br /> investment. So one of the thoughts that we discussed at the last Redevelopment Agency meeting <br /> was the concept of having a request for proposal where the Redevelopment Agency could be <br /> used as a mechanism to facilitate memorandums of agreements that have been utilized by other <br /> redevelopment agencies, namely in the Kaka`ako formats for the purpose of dealing with the <br /> Page 4 of21 <br /> Banyan Drive Hawaii Redevelopment Agency <br /> October 25,2017 Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.