My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-01-04 Hearing Transcript - Celestial Sanctum SPP 17-192
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2018
>
2018-01-04 Hearing Transcript - Celestial Sanctum SPP 17-192
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2018 1:51:59 PM
Creation date
2/1/2018 1:51:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CLARKSON: Right. <br />KERN: So, there would be, they propose to build two additional bedrooms downstairs so within <br />the same structure. Thus, creating seven bedrooms in total. The Applicants occupy one and <br />there's six bedrooms leftover. How it would differ now? And so right now, it's basically, you <br />know, vacation rental style. You know, up to five guests. One, you know, one family. So, what <br />would be different is they would be allowed to do the 13 retreats a year, which you'd have more, <br />you know, yoga, workshops, more of a group type activity. They would also be allowed to have <br />the commercial kitchen which would allow them to serve their guests, which is a little bit <br />different than just a regular bed & breakfast where you can offer overnight accommodations for <br />up to ten guests and serve them breakfast. They want the ability to serve, you know, breakfast, <br />lunch, or dinner. That's the certified kitchen, and that would be again limited to their guests. <br />So, the difference would be obviously allowableso, five more people, no more additional <br />development, the certified kitchen, and allowing to do the 13 retreats per year with still only <br />limiting that to ten, ten guests. And, again, they would still have the burden of, you know, <br />making the improvements to bring the road up to par and what not. And, I did explain very well <br />as far as the Special Permit area that everything has to stay within that Special Permit area. <br />Thus, it was made maybe a little bit larger than it, you know, could have been just to give that, <br />that buffer zone around there. <br />So, that's pretty much how it would change. The conditions don't change, but the request has <br />come down significantly. <br />CLARKSON: And, how long has it been in operation as a vacation rental property? About a <br />year? <br />KERN: About a year. <br />CLARKSON: Okay. Any other questions from the Commission? Okay, thank you. <br />KERN: Thank you very much. <br />CLARKSON: You have the <br />KERN: We've read <br />CLARKSON: —the Background and Recommendation. Has that been revised? <br />KERN: Yes, and so to answer your forthcoming question, yes, the revised Recommendation and <br />Background Report is acceptable by the Applicants. <br />CLARKSON: Okay, thank you. <br />KERN: Thank you. <br />EXHIBIT C <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.