My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-01-04 Hearing Transcript - Verizon Wireless USE 17-067
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2018
>
2018-01-04 Hearing Transcript - Verizon Wireless USE 17-067
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2018 1:53:29 PM
Creation date
2/1/2018 1:53:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SCHISZLER: I don't have a question about why. I have a question about where does that, <br />where does that lead from—now, where do we go from here is my question. Where can we <br />expect this—that's my question. <br />HALL: I work for the County so I can't really give you legal advice on what you can and can't <br />do. I would just consult you to speak to an attorney and find out what you can do. <br />SCHISZLER: Not about what I can do. Where is this case going to be going from here? What <br />is the next step in this case? Is this the last hearing? <br />HALL: Yes, basically, this is the last hearing. <br />SCHISZLER: So, this, this is to—the tower has now been approved. <br />HALL: It hasn't been approved yet. There's no motion on the table at this point. <br />CLARKSON: Oh, I'm sorry, I misunderstood you. So, what's going to happen now is we're <br />going to vote on whether or not to close public testimony, and then we're going to have a <br />discussion on the merits of the application. If there is any, then we're going to have a motion <br />one way or another on the application, and then the Commission will vote on that motion, and at <br />that time, the matter will be pretty much concluded unless there's an appeal by the Applicant of <br />our action. <br />So, at this time, I'd like to hear a motion for the closure of public testimony, please? <br />IKEDA: Move to close public testimony. <br />HENKEL: Second. <br />CLARKSON: It's been moved by Commissioner Ikeda and seconded by Commissioner Henkel <br />to close public testimony. All those in favor? <br />COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br />CLARKSON: Opposed? Public testimony is closed. So, we now need a motion on <br />HENKEL: —Can we have some discussion first? <br />CLARKSON: Yeah. <br />HENKEL: The Applicant has offered to mitigate the one concern about the location of the tower <br />and move it further in the lot. Another big concern seems to be in this issue in past applications, <br />as you heard is the electromagnetic radiation, and I mean, I've done my own research. I found <br />out for every study that says that it's very dangerous, there's another study that says it's not that <br />dangerous, especially now that they've gone to digital signals. So, it kind of depends on your <br />point of view as, you know, which study you've read last. <br />EXHIBIT D <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.