2018-01-18 Leeward Exh B (AMEND SMA 412, REZ 17-225 & SMA 17-068))

Home

Then on, you know, Item Number 9, you see the, you know, like you hear and read the comments that come up, you know, relating to this project, and when I’ve read through almost all of those comments, they seem to have like a common thread, you know, the thread being like what’s the impact to the anchialine ponds, what’s the impact on public parking, what’s the impact on coastal access, the marine life and, you know, resources, such as the green sea turtle, and what about the archaeological, cultural resources. So from that standpoint on the anchialine pond, you know, that’s the Item 9, you know, the Fish and Wildlife Service is, they’re one entity like how we rely on SHPD on archaeological end, from the Fish and Wildlife Service, you know, there’s a lot of reliance on what, you know, they have the technical knowledge, so we rely on whatever they have to say in addition to our own consultant, in this case here Dr. Brock and Dr. Steve Dollar. But the Fish and Wildlife Service, specifically as it relates to the anchialine pond and the damselflies, says like you know the plan that you guys have prepared by Dr. Brock, that’s the best you can do. And that’s, that’s, that’s their statement on Page 8, and I kind of highlighted it for you; it says, “In addition to the measures listed below,” all of which the applicant had agreed to accept, it says, “we strongly recommend that you implement the management plan” prepared, you know, in Exhibit B, Exhibit Delta, rather, that’s the plan prepared by Dr. Richard Brock. And it goes on to say the Fish and Wildlife Service supports SHPD’s recommendation to monitor the two anchialine ponds and the ephemeral pond. And that’s going to happen. I’d like to also kind of, you know, like the staff pointed out to the email that’s also found in the same section towards the end, you know, from Eldridge Naboa, you know, with the Fish and Wildlife Service – he went on the field inspection and I accompanied them and, you know, I learned a lot from the inspection as well – but, you know, his recommendation, you know, was to say that on the large anchialine pond, for example, not the five-foot buffer that Dr. Brock had recommended in his management plan but a 40-foot buffer. But that’s why they accommodated, as you can see, you know, the 40-foot buffer is like, you know, you see the big pond and there is no, no dwellings between that pond and the proposed parking lot area. And then talk about placing signage, sure, you know, that’s all going to happen. So in addition to whatever was written in the Fish and Wildlife Service’s letter, these additional recommendations by Fish and Wildlife staff, the owner has said, the applicant has said we’ll accept. There was also the other issue about, you know, the green sea turtle – and, again, please feel free to ask the question of Dr. Dollar, you know, and Dr. Brock, you know, those kind of question because they’ll be here to testify as well – but on the issue of the green sea turtle, again, the Fish and Wildlife Service, they are kind of like I would consider the agency guru, you know, on this kind of area as well, and if you look at Page Number, Page 6 of their letter, which I’ve enclosed, it specifically talks about green sea turtles. This is like Item Number 10, and then the second page of that letter from Fish and Wildlife Service, and basically it says the, on the green sea turtle, the Fish and Wildlife Service consults on sea turtles, and then they go on to suggest what needs to be done, you know, to minimize the impact. And I think Ms. Jackson had read some of their mitigations then and also how you address the green sea turtle issue. And all of those recommended mitigation by, suggested by the Fish and Wildlife Service is acceptable to the applicant, and should the Commission in its wisdom decide to approve the SMA Permit and make that as a condition, it’s not going to come with any objection on the part of the applicant. On Item Number 11, you know, really deals like with the lateral coastal access. The staff talked about like there have been some concerns about like, you know, whether there is some restriction 14 EXHIBIT B