2018-01-18 Leeward Exh B (AMEND SMA 412, REZ 17-225 & SMA 17-068))

Home

Who will han- what kind, what do we do with the sewage, the water demands, and the power demands on our grid? We have frequent blackouts, as you know, of power. Is there going to be any type of limit to what we can possibly provide for further expansion? The, I’m speaking as a person, there are also other animals that use the shore. We have the turtles. There’s, oh, don’t worry, we will take big plastic fencing any time there is, the turtle will be surrounded by fencing. If I were a turtle on the beach and someone came with plastic fencing, okay, it’s time for me to leave now, and the turtle will vacate. What about the sand crabs? What about the herons? What about the seasonal birds that come to be on Hawai‘i? Who will stand up for them to say this is too much population density? We need to limit. I wholeheartedly agree that we do need transition from this is open, this is resort. Why must we develop to the very end? Why cannot we have a transition period? For those various reasons, again, I strongly recommend that you please deny the access, the request to amend SMA 412 and allow so much dense development in that particular land, which cannot stand by itself. It must rely on the other parcel; it should be treated as one parcel. Thank you for your consideration. Aloha. UNGER: Aloha. Thank you. You all may be seated. Thank you. David\[sic\] Harlow, Francois Arlhac, Mereane Hamatake, Joel Cohen, Julia Alos and Richard Brock. Rick Gmirkin. You can start, Mr. Gmirkin. GMIRKIN: Aloha mai kākou. My name is Rick Gmirkin. I’m the archaeologist for Ala Kahakai National Historic Trail. Mr. Chairman, Commissioners, thank you very much for allowing Ala Kahakai to provide comments regarding Waikoloa BC. The presentation earlier this morning by the applicant was well received I think for some of the aspects, removal of the pool and also the event lawn and facility. That being said, that broader landscape is still one of the things that we have been asking for preservation of since the beginning, since we’ve been involved in commenting on this project. So the project area, although small, is home to important cultural and natural resources, including 14 archaeological sites comprised of over 300 features, over 230 individual petroglyphs around this property, habitation complex including caves, anchialine pools, threatened and endangered species, including endangered orangeblack damselfly and the threatened green sea turtle, and of course trails. ‘Anaeho‘omalu has been a major destination for native Hawaiians for well over 800 years. As one of the major coastal hubs, or villages, in West Hawai‘i, trails enter this location from many directions, and I mean this particular parcel directed basically that main anchialine pool on the property. At least four major branches of prehistoric trails enter the subject parcel from the south and, as mentioned before, they connect to the, they connect to the Kīholo-Puakō Trail and the Ala Loa. These trails and one in particular was used all the way through historic times, and it’s evidenced by, you know, deep grooving, as well as horseshoes along the trail itself. These trails have been in use for well over 500, I would, I would say over 1,000 years. The archaeological preservation plan and project SMA heavily emphasize the preservation of those three, of three trails, and of the intensive trail network within the project area. There is still concern for all of these other trails because of the recently damaged trail, the one that was, one of the three that was intended to be preserved. Use of heavy equipment in this fragile cultural landscape will place the remaining trails and associated buffers in jeopardy. And I’m pointing more toward by the area where the cave site is, and that stretch of still intact ‘a‘ā lava 24 EXHIBIT B