Communication No. 2018-08- KCDP Amendments Subcommittee Report

Home

Public parking fees should be set low enough to be affordable yet high enough to discourage automobile use. Objective TRAN-5 Rural Transit. To provide a paratransit system for Kona – with emphasis on mauka areas and South Kona recognizing that a rural population cannot support an urban transit system. Policy TRAN–5.1: Paratransit. An affordable public paratransit system shall should serve the general public of South Kona (i.e., it should not be restricted by age or disabilities). Objective TRAN-6 Concurrency. To manage the timing of growth so as to avoid overloading the arterial system. Policy TRAN–6.1: Official Concurrency Map. The Kona UA shall be designated as a “critical road area”, as defined in HCC 25-2-46. Rezonings within the Kona UA shall comply with the Official Concurrency Map (see Table 4-1 and Figure 4-3), which identifies the road segments to be constructed concurrent with occupancy of units as the minimum “area mitigation”, as defined in HCC 25-2-46(Zoning Code).Concurrency requirements shall be determined by HCC §25-2-46supplemented as follows: and be generally consistent with the Official ConcurrencyMap, where applicable, as determined by the approved TIAR. The Kona UA shall be designated as a “critical road area” pursuant to HCC §25-2-46(j) that triggers “area mitigation”; Concurrency requirements shall not apply to rezonings where a TIAR is notrequired pursuant to HCC §25-2-46(d()(1); Area mitigation requirements shall be determined by the Official ConcurrencyMap (Figure 4-3) and table (Table 4-1) and TRAN-1.1, as applicable; Area mitigation, where required, shall be deemed satisfied upon defining theapplicable right-of-way by metes and bounds or guaranteeing the performance of that commitment pursuant to HCC §25-2-46(f)(2) at the time of subdivision or plan approval, except as otherwise required by TRAN-1.1. As applicable, permit approvals (e.g., rezonings, subdivisions, planned unit developments, plan approvals) shall commit the rights-of-way and/or improvements of proposed roadways shown on the Official Transportation mMap that traverse through the project area. with discretion to the Planning Director to determine tThe extent of reservation and/or improvements shall be proportionate to the project’s impact as determined by the project’s approved TIAR. If the corridor alignment has not been sufficiently studied, the Planning Director has the discretion to determine an appropriate action including realigning or other appropriate feasible alternative prior to the tentative subdivision/plan approval. The Official Concurrency Map assumes: Note: See Attachment A at end of document