Laserfiche WebLink
a formal understanding or does the Building people come to you and say, "You know, <br />this guy shouldn't get their license extended." Is there any kind of overlap between the <br />departments? <br />Takase: Informally there is. It's coming up as part of our final inspection process. <br />That's how this one came up. These things are not compliant. <br />Greenwell: Gerald, let me re -phrase it. You hear people come in and say they have <br />problems with Building, electrical, plumbing or this and that. You seem to be so pro- <br />business and want to help them. Do the Building people come to you and say, "Hey, <br />these guys aren't doing their job"? Why are you so pro-business and some of these <br />others are not? <br />Takase: I think a part of it is because of where I sat previously. As a former Assistant <br />Corporation Counsel, I can see these problems coming up and can anticipate them. <br />don't think their problems cannot necessarily be resolved. In my estimation, it's our <br />responsibility to at least make sure that these places are safe. In a lot of these <br />situations, it has nothing really to do with the safety, but rather you have to meet some <br />Code requirements and a lot of the time, Code requirements keep changing on people. <br />If they're working to get them resolved, we will help them get there because if we don't <br />allow the business to continue, they're probably not going to have money to do the <br />changes anyway. We're going to cause them to go out of business. The problem will <br />never be taken care of, so I would like to give them a chance to rectify that. We look at <br />the Licensees. If the Licensee's just refusing to do anything, we will not approve those, <br />however, where the Licensee's trying to do everything within their power to bring <br />themselves into compliance, those are the situations where we will help them from our <br />position. I don't think our primary duty is to make sure that all of the Code requirements <br />are in place. I think we should not be ignoring them, but we will help them get to a place <br />where they can get things done. Overall, in the inventory of business spaces, we <br />should all be working towards bringing them all into compliance. If the space is not <br />going to be rented, then nothing is ever going to happen there. Hopefully, by having a <br />business in there, things will get done to bring them into compliance. That's our <br />philosophy of what we're doing. <br />Greenwell: I understand, Gerald, but it seems that you allow people to do tents like in <br />Pahoa and here these poor guys are trying to get through the hoops and the hurdles <br />with the other side of the County. It's understandable that you want to keep them in <br />business. <br />Taniguchi: Any other questions? Very good question. <br />There were no further questions from the Commissioners. <br />Taniguchi: Since none, all those in favor signify by saying, "Aye." <br />The Commissioners voted "Aye." <br />FEBRUARY 1, 2018 -LIQUOR COMMISSION MINUTES 24 <br />