Laserfiche WebLink
subject properties would be on the right hand side, and then this is looking like standing in the <br />middle of the road here looking back towards the highway. So, the subject properties are on the <br />left. <br />The Planning Director is recommending approval of the amendment to Special Permit No. 842. <br />And, I just want to point out one thing. If you look at the goldenrod sheet which shows your <br />Recommendation and the conditions, so the requested amendment is to Condition 4, and you'll <br />notice if you look at Condition No. 10, usually after, after all of the conditions at the very end, <br />we usually have a condition that says the Applicant can request an administrative time extension <br />from the Planning Director. We don't have one in this case. At some point, through the history <br />of this permit, because there have been several time extensions, that permit condition was <br />dropped. So, if the Commission feels like more time should be granted administratively so the <br />Applicant doesn't have to keep coming back for additional time extensions, we can add that <br />condition in. But, as it stands now, that condition is not in your recommended conditions of <br />approval. <br />That concludes my presentation. I'd be happy to answer any questions. <br />CLARKSON: Any questions from any Commissioner? Okay, I have a question. This has been <br />under the Special Permit since 1983. <br />JACKSON: Nineteen ninety-three. <br />CLARKSON: I mean ninety-three, 25 years, and they're requesting another 15 years essentially, <br />which if my math is correct, that makes 40 years. Are there any Planning Department guidelines <br />as to how long time extensions go before they are recommended against? <br />JACKSON: Typically, the Department is open to continuing to allow time extensions unless <br />there's been some significant change in the General Plan for the area or the land use pattern has <br />significant changed to where we would no longer recommend time extensions because the use <br />isn't as appropriate as it once was. <br />CLARKSON: Thank you. <br />JACKSON: So, that's not the case for this particular area. <br />CLARKSON: Thank you. Any other questions? Thank you, Maija. Would the Applicant or <br />their representative please come forward? Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth on this matter <br />now before the Planning Commission? <br />FUKE: Yes, I do. <br />CLARKSON: Would you please state your name and speak directly into the microphone, <br />please? <br />EXHIBIT A <br />3 <br />