My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-06-09 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2014
>
2014-06-09 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2018 12:41:23 PM
Creation date
3/9/2018 10:01:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
compelling argument, which is a Game Management Plan. MB said fencing is part of the future. <br />We're seeing collateral damage. DLNR should be accountable. MB spoke about the effects of <br />fencing. The fences have created a situation where animals are destroying property because <br />they are prevented from going into their "natural habitat." Fencing is now being erected by <br />NARS and watershed. Ike questioned the state's response to protect the palila by saying that <br />the palila habitat decision said the animals could co -exist. <br />WB said the state is protecting the watershed. The state is protecting the public resource. <br />TL said there is no threat to the watershed and the state's arguments are flawed. He said the <br />people in Hawaii should be able to choose what to do with resource. TL also said the <br />constitutional protection was lost by slight of hand. There are some weird things going on. <br />Mayor offered to match $110K from the state. TL asked what happened to the bill. TS said <br />DLNR was concerned about where the money was going to come from and talked the Leg out of <br />it. <br />WB said GMAC ideas are not bad, but GMAC needs to know what the hurdles are before they <br />start the race. WB said GMAC should convince the state to give greater consideration that our <br />wild animals are just as important to the public as endangered plants or birds, and so there <br />should be better balance. Maybe we can find a better funding source. <br />TL said this is because there is no game management plan. He suggested a $25 license fee and <br />getting the money into the wildlife revolving fund. We need to get the rules changed. <br />BC said draft a letter from the mayor that says the fencing has unintended consequences and <br />we humbly ask that the state address those things. WC said the other side of the sword is <br />eradication. He said this is part of a grand plan to eradicate all the game animals. I agree that <br />we be proactive but we gotta be careful. IY said GMAC needs to define what we're talking <br />about. State is schzo. In one part of HRS it talks about animals as game. In others it talks about <br />animals as invasive. <br />MB moved that we write a letter saying that there are unintended consequences. TS <br />seconds, IY said this should be written with the entire state in mind. TL said the problem is not <br />the pigs but the fencing. DLNR wants DOA to do something about it. MB said he would draft <br />this letter. WB said to draft and submit at the next meeting for approval. Motion was <br />unanimous by voice vote. <br />Public meeting is closed <br />Executive Session called to clarify the duties and responsibilities of the commission. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.