Laserfiche WebLink
A compelling reason for an exception to this approach would be when part of a parcel is in an Open <br />LUPAG designation (such as when part of a parcel is within the State Land Use Conservation district <br />— e.g., along the coastline or in mauka forests). Any part of a parcel that is designated as LUPAG <br />Open would remain Open for that specific area of the parcel. Other exceptions to this parcel - <br />specific strategy would be when the parcel is large and may need to reflect two (or more) different <br />types of LUPAG designations. For example, when the parcel borders a town where part of it would <br />be within the Urban Growth Boundary, and yet the large parcel stretches farther into agricultural <br />areas where an Agricultural designation is appropriate. <br />The CDP strategy of making specific parcel -level recommendations at the Urban Boundary line for <br />LUPAG designations adds clarity, specificity, and increases transparency into the land use <br />designation process and more accurately reflects the County's and the Community's land use goals <br />and intentions. <br />Policy 6 <br />Until the General Plan identifies appropriate areas or criteria for Industrial development to occur <br />in the Hamakua Planning Area, industrial uses may be permitted outside LUPAG Industrial <br />designated areas through the following regulatory review processes: <br />■ LUPAG Amendment and Change of Zone: If the subject property is located in the State Land Use <br />Urban district, a LUPAG amendment and change of zone request to the appropriate industrial <br />zoning could be considered and evaluated on a case-by-case basis; <br />■ Special Use: If the subject property is located in the State Land Use Agricultural or Rural <br />District, and the project type is consistent with a permitted use of either limited -industrial <br />(ML) or commercial -industrial zoning (MCX), the special use permit process would be the <br />appropriate review mechanism to evaluate the specific parameters of the proposal and set <br />any mitigating conditions. <br />Any requests for Industrial uses shall be carefully evaluated for potential impacts and consistency <br />with CDP policies and objectives, HRS 205 (including the land study bureau's detailed land <br />agricultural land productivity rating), and the General Plan. Industrial development shall be <br />located in areas adequately served by transportation, utilities, and other essential infrastructure <br />(General Plan Policy 14.4.3 (e)). <br />Rationale: This is an affirmation of General Plan policy 14.4.3(e) and is in line with Community <br />Objective 5. It also affirms General Plan policies 14.4.5.2.2 (b) (South Hilo), 14.4.5.3.2 (a) (North <br />Hilo), and 14.4.5.4.2 (a) (Hamakua), "Identify sites suitable for future industrial activities as the need <br />arises." <br />As noted in Factor 10 from Policy 1, the majority of the currently zoned Industrial areas in the <br />Planning Area are no longer seen as suitable for heavy industry since these types of uses are <br />generally considered to be offensive or have some element of danger. Many industrial properties <br />are legacy zoning remnants from the sugar plantations and are sited in environmentally sensitive <br />locations (see also Policy 2). This policy differentiates between two types of regulatory mechanisms <br />and clarifies which process could be pursued. This policy demonstrates flexibility on a case-by-case <br />APPENDIX v5: HAMAKUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN I Section 3: Policy Rationale — <br />Preferred Settlement Patterns & Land Use <br />