My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-01-23 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Kailua Village Design Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2024
>
2018
>
2018-01-23 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 3:53:11 PM
Creation date
3/21/2018 3:53:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Sarona Road. The elevator is 34’-8” tall which is aligned within the existing roof height of <br />the hotel. The freestanding elevator will be visible from Hualalai Road. <br />Applicant: Fritz Harris Glade, AIA <br />Landowner: Kona Hospitality LLC <br />TMK: (3) 7-5-007: 009 <br />Location: 75-146 Sarona Road, Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 <br /> <br />Mr. Dunlap displayed some site photographs, and gave a PowerPoint presentation of the <br />applicant’s submittal. He described the proposed project, and pointed to the photographs <br />showing views going down Sarona Road and views of the west side of the building where the <br />elevator tower would be located. Mr. Dunlap explained that there would be bridges from the <br />tower to the second and third floor. He further explained that there would be views from <br />Hualalai Road through parking lot behind Uncle Billy’s hotel. Mr. Dunlap then proceeded to go <br />through the elevations of the elevator tower and said that the Master Plan for Kailua-Kona <br />recommends accents and that the applicant is showing rock wainscoting on the first level of the <br />tower and narrower slats on the remaining two floors. <br />Mr. Fritz Harris-Glade, architect/applicant gave a brief presentation on the project and said that <br />the reason for the elevator is that the current one tends to malfunction and they are looking for a <br />new location for an elevator. Mr. Harris-Glade said that horizontal wainscoting on the bottom of <br />column is present they could extend the rock veneer to the elevator tower. <br />Commissioner Van Pernis asked if a tree could be placed near the elevator tower and Mr. Harris- <br />Glade said that would be acceptable. <br />Commissioner Ikeuchi asked if the current elevator would remain in use and the Mr. Harris- <br />Glade responded that yes, it would be used for service employees. <br />Discussion by the Commissioners followed on suggestions for the color match of the elevator <br />tower and suggestions for the tree planting. It was recommended that the tower match the color <br />of the building along with the white belly band between the second and third level, and trees <br />planted next to the tower eventually grow up to 25 feet. <br />The final amended motion made by Commissioner Van Pernis and seconded by Commissioner <br />Roth that the Commission forward to the Planning Director a recommendation to accept this <br />submittal as presented with the following modifications: 1) have the rock veneer be the same <br />height as the first floor with bushy trees or fan palms planted in vicinity of the proposed elevator <br />on the south side of the tower that will eventually grow up to 25 feet; 2) have the white belly <br />band remain between the second and third level and match the existing color scheme; and 3) the <br />batts will be 16” to 24” on center. There being no further discussion on the motion, a roll call <br />vote was taken and the motion carried with seven ayes. (Van Pernis, Sullenberger, Ching, Kern, <br />Hetherington, Ikeuchi and Roth) and one absent and excused (Crusat). <br /> <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.