Laserfiche WebLink
<br />forward to buy 42 acres from Kamehameha Schools, but that legislation is not listed in the <br />Director’s Report. Whether or not the county will purchase that land is still in the hopper; and as <br />everyone knows, Kamehameha Schools needs financial help due to all the pending lawsuits. The <br />county could help Kamehameha Schools out by buying the surplus land, and that would be <br />cronyism again. As far as the EPA goes, they just want the county to abandon its gang <br />cesspools. The EPA is not forcing the county to turn wastewater into R-1. That is not what the <br />county is in court for, and it is not what the county is mandated to do. Both Pāhala and Nāālehu ʻ <br />are under mandates, and the clock is ticking. The only thing that can turn back the clock is an <br />eruption of Mauna Loa, and it is an even bet which will happen first—an eruption or a new <br />treatment system for Kaū.ʻ <br /> <br />4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br /> <br /> There was no unfinished business. <br /> <br />5. NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br />a. Discussion and potential advisory resolution on the Ninth Circuit Court <br />ruling dated February 1, 2018, regarding wastewater discharges in Hawaiʻi <br />(Hawaiʻi Wildlife Fund vs. County of Maui, No. 15-17447) and the advisability <br />of NPDES permitting for Hawaiʻi County. <br /> <br /> Chair Bennett explained that he placed this item on the agenda because the ruling, in his <br />estimation, will have a profound influence on wastewater discharges for the state, and perhaps <br />for the entire country. Wastewater discharges to the ground are the principal means by which <br />most wastewater is discharged in this state, though there are some ocean outfalls. Smaller <br />wastewater discharges go into the ground and cesspits, leachfields, drainage pits, and injection <br />wells. It is largely unknown where all these areas are and how much is being discharged. <br /> <br /> He felt it would be valuable to make the EMC aware of the issue and have a discussion. <br />The Court of Appeals basically ruled that when a discharge to land finds a conveyance to the <br />ocean, it constitutes a point source discharge. A point source discharge into the waters of the <br />United States must be permitted under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System <br />(NPDES). The county has a number of permitted discharges, but individual homes, gang <br />cesspools, and community wastewater treatment units are not permitted. <br /> <br /> About ten years ago, he suggested to the state that these wastewater discharges were <br />going into the ocean. The state responded that the waters did not go into the ocean—they stay <br />under the land and do not communicate with the waters of the United States, and as such the <br />Clean Water Act does not apply. He has a letter from the state saying this. Subsequently, there <br />have been two major scientific studies, one in Kihei by Charles Hunt of the U.S. Geological <br />Survey, and another more recently in Lahaina. Both studies showed to a scientific certainty that <br />those injections were finding their way to the ocean in fairly discrete conveyances, such as lava <br />tubes, which are a common feature of our geology. It is imperative to assume the discharges are <br />reaching the ocean until there is certain scientific proof showing otherwise. The county and state <br />need to look at resources with the public’s interest in mind. <br /> <br /> <br />