Laserfiche WebLink
heated water in itself contaminating the aquifer and then the metals that it picks up. When <br />you're moving millions of gallons a day, you are stripping the metal, okay? From the piping. <br />So, I just want you Commissioners to realize and to think about how important water is to our <br />needs. And, as Gino said, our children are going to be faced with it in the future. Thank you. <br />CLARKSON: Thank you, all. Commissioners, do you have any questions for the initial group <br />of testifiers? If not, please be seated, and we'll call up an additional six people. Where's my <br />glasses? Matt Trask, Cory Harden, Claudia Rohr, George Martin, Steve Johnson, and David <br />Ordenstein. Okay, is George Martin in the building? Apparently not, but for those of you who <br />haven't been sworn in, please raise your right hands. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth on <br />this matter before the Planning Commission today? <br />TESTIFIERS: I do. <br />CLARKSON: Thank you. We'll start with the gentlemen on my left, and please introduce <br />yourself and proceed. <br />TRASK: Sure. My name is Matthew Trask, Matt Trask. I live in Pepe`ekeo about a mile from <br />that power plant site. I also happen to be an environmental professional and a noise expert as <br />well as other areas of environmental law. One of which, [inaudible] on almost every <br />environmental law as I'm sure you know is that you examine both the indirect impacts as the <br />direct impacts. Now, here we have some situation where you've been remanded to look at the <br />impacts of something that the Applicant is now saying is not going to happen. Well, if that's not <br />going to happen, something else is, and you know what that is—it's the injections. So, I would <br />think that there would have to be an analysis of that injection because it is an indirect impact of <br />the decision that you're about to make. <br />So, I would like to personally push for a deep analysis especially looking at Clean Water Act, <br />Section 316(a) and (b) and to bring this information forward. And, I wanted to point out to <br />everybody here, I was an electrician for many years. I am pro development for the simple reason <br />that if people don't build things, I don't work. But, what I do with every project I work on is I <br />push to make that project the best project it can be for that project, for the protection of the <br />developers from lawsuits, and for the next project and the next project after that. If you want a <br />good industry, you want good projects. You have to do it right from the beginning, and I'm <br />afraid this project, because we're trying to ram something through that was under an old permit, <br />is not the best way we can do it. <br />And, I understand the constraints of the developer. I understand the need for good jobs on this <br />island. But, for the long term health of the industry, we need to do this right, and the way it's <br />being done is not right. <br />HARDEN: Cory Harden for Sierra Club Moku Loa Group on the impacts on the Outfall. On <br />thisfirst, I want to thank you folks all for your volunteer service, and would you please try to <br />get answers to some questions on this. Is it no action? Is that the correct response? Hu Honua <br />says they're not going to repair or replace, and they believe there will be no impacts so you folks <br />EXHIBIT C <br />15 <br />