Laserfiche WebLink
register...she...the way the bill is written is that...her being able to <br /> have it as her condo as a vacation rental would continue even if she <br /> sells it...were there's nothing in the bill to allow anybody else that <br /> gets grandfathered in to have one of these things...to pass on the <br /> license to the next person that purchases that property...so that <br /> also...over time...you know the goal is to lower the number of <br /> competing vacation rentals outside of the very exclusive you know <br /> high income not diverse at all resort zones like the one that Ms. <br /> Eoff has a vacation rental in...that...absolutely benefits her as <br /> there is less competition...just like if all if you know my vacation <br /> rental was there and all the other ones in neighborhood went <br /> away...I could charge a lot more...you know if I didn't...if I paid <br /> nothing and they all had to pay five hundred dollars a year...that <br /> would be an unfair advantage for me...so it is an unfair advantage <br /> for Ms. Eoff and unfortunately she has not recused herself from <br /> this process I know that she's taken meetings on this issue even <br /> since she's asked the board to give her a ruling on whether or not <br /> there's a conflict of interest here...I don't know if there's <br /> any...aspects of the Sunshine Law that were violated I only <br /> brought that up because Ms. David expressed concern several <br /> months ago when I was trying to get input from other Council <br /> members before this legislation was even proposed...that Ms. <br /> David didn't feel it was appropriate for her to comment on it <br /> because really no more than two Council members and there were <br /> already two Council members that were discussing it so she did not <br /> want to be part that so...you know I don't know if any other <br /> Council members violated that...I feel like overall that's a minor <br /> issue and not something I'm not especially...personally informed <br /> about...regarding the Sunshine Laws but figured those on the <br /> Ethics Board could take a moment and at least consider...was there <br /> anything that could have violated the Sunshine Laws in this <br /> process...so that's pretty much it... I mean I think it's...you know <br /> there's also of course the issue...should she recuse herself..the <br /> second issue is are there any consequences for her lying to <br /> someone and saying that she's never owned a rental of any kind <br /> and using County funds...County computers to do that...you know <br /> the minor issue of were there any Sunshine Laws violated...but <br /> ultimately...I think the biggest issue is did she fail to disclose <br /> every having more than a thousand dollars income from this <br /> transient vacation rental that she co-owns...that seems very <br /> 15 <br />