My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
03-19-18 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2018
>
03-19-18 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2018 12:21:54 PM
Creation date
5/15/2018 12:21:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
be the legal...State law that they would need to be doing if they <br /> can show that...then all the currently operating vacation rentals <br /> whether they are in the neighborhood...whether they're in <br /> residential zoning...or whether they're in ag would have that <br /> process in order to become grandfathered in...and as Mr. <br /> Takemoto said...only would apply to those vacation rentals where <br /> there is no owner on site...so any other type of rental wouldn't be <br /> covered in this bill...and has been stated...my husband and I do <br /> own... a small condo unit at the Islander and...it's already an <br /> allowable use fare...it's not subject to the proposed lqgislation and <br /> I don't believe I have any financial significant financial gain...so <br /> as I said I don't believe I violated any provisions of the Code of <br /> Ethics but I took the concerns to heart and I appreciate your <br /> guidance in this matter...there is some references in the petition <br /> itself that I may not have covered just now...and I'm sure you've <br /> read through that but I did want to address the conflict of interest <br /> that Mr. Guzman has pointed out and as far as our email exchange <br /> which yes was very unfortunate...I was involved in another <br /> meeting when my staff brought me the email because it was very <br /> concerning the way it was written...it was...cc'd to all the Council <br /> members and the Mayor I think and I don't know if the <br /> Prosecuting Attorney...but it was to me it like a global outrage <br /> because it was cc'd to newspapers...and I replied very rapidly on <br /> my IPhone...it was a hastily response which isn't my normal <br /> approach to email exchanges but I did it because it seemed like I <br /> better stop this right now because I don't own a vacation rental that <br /> would require grandfathering in...and my first read of his email to <br /> me was just that...I thought he was accusing me of being in a <br /> conflict of interest because I was working on something that would <br /> grandfather me in like a special privilege...but one more thing I <br /> wanted to address about what...the grandfathering in does...it <br /> actually...and this is something we've been discussing but once <br /> the privilege is granted...in a certain zoning district for instance <br /> the grandfathering in of a short-term vacation rental in a residential <br /> area...that use would run with the land...so we will...in essence be <br /> allowing these to continue in the areas that its been operating...I'm <br /> not sure if I should address the financial disclosure issue...I didn't <br /> mention it my petition but I...and if doesn't in any way...I'm not <br /> trying to address his issue but I kind of feel compelled to clear that <br /> up and I don't know if you would advise me to go ahead with that <br /> 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.