Laserfiche WebLink
Ordinance and the U.S. Constitution is Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2. One can read Sai vs. <br />Clinton, 2011. <br />The land speculation the Kingdom did not allow because of the native tenant rights involved. <br />Lands was only leased out, and if you look at the history, the lease is about to end in the early <br />1920's, so when they create—the U.S. Congress illegally created the Hawaiian Homes <br />Commission Act. It only, it was limited to 1.8 million acres. The rest of the lands was left out <br />because they had plans on claiming they owned the lands and that's, that's why it's left out. So, <br />in the 1959 Admission Act, you can read that the fake State of Hawaii was given 1.8 million <br />acres only. Limited. Not beyond that. So, a lot of lands was left out. But, anyway, the <br />Admission Act is based on the Northwest Ordinance. Every element of it is based on that. <br />So, the lands are still Crown and Government lands. We're still in the jurisdiction of the <br />Hawaiian Kingdom. There's no State of Hawaii. The courts here are kangaroo courts based on <br />that. They cannot make decisions over the Northwest Ordinance. The Northwest Ordinance is <br />limited to the courts in Washington D.C. only. They are the only courts that have jurisdiction <br />over the Northwest Ordinance and the U.S. Constitution question over the treaty, the Reciprocity <br />Treaty. <br />So, with that, I'll end with the reservation of the rights of this Kingdom under the Queen's <br />protest of January 7, 1893 against U. S. Minister Stevens, as he has to make his way to the U.S. <br />Supreme Court, Article 3, Section 2, Clause 2, original but limited jurisdiction only over U.S. <br />Minister Stevens. The other question is whether the U.S. can extend the Article Five of the <br />Northwest Ordinance which is Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution beyond the <br />limits to include the Hawaiian Kingdom and beyond. Thank you. <br />SHROPSHIRE: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, members of the committee. My name is Steve <br />Shropshire. I reside in Papa`ikou, and I'm the owner of Hakalau Point, which is an <br />approximately 8 -acre parcel of land makai of the highway. It's the same piece of property that <br />was referenced to earlier. <br />I'm a fourth generation farmer. I spent my entire life in the ag industry. I currently have farms <br />here that we have ornamental plants, tropical fruit, and other cattle operations, so I'm very vested <br />in farming and agriculture. <br />I purchased this piece of property roughly 15 years ago, and I bought it, and I've invested <br />millions of dollars in this property. I bought it because it'sI felt it was a very unique <br />opportunity. It represents one-tenth of one percent of the available Industrial land that's on this <br />island. It's a very rare commodity. <br />I started participating in the Hamakua CDP with my son. I attended over 20 meetings. As you <br />heard earlier, it's a seven-year process. We contributed. We provided input, and we were very <br />excited about our ability to use our property and make it available to really help to fill the goals <br />and visions of the Hamakua CDP which includes promoting, preserving a sustainable diverse <br />economy, local economy, a lot about supporting agriculture and ag-tourism, sustainable <br />agriculture, farming, ranching, revitalizing retail services, dining. Hakalau was once a thriving <br />EXHIBIT D <br />12 <br />