My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-05-03 Hearing Transcript - Hamakua CDP
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2018
>
2018-05-03 Hearing Transcript - Hamakua CDP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2018 2:52:10 PM
Creation date
6/7/2018 2:51:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
and when the Hamakua CDP says things like the objectives are to encourage development so that <br />they are not coastal dependent to move somewhere else, that makes perfect sense because you <br />have this resource. <br />It also made sense to just protect the views, protect the beauty of it, and all of that. So, what <br />happens is this one parcel of land that we all know about has been very controversial in the sense <br />that the community wants to try to protect that land as much as we can as long as we can. And, <br />that's what's been going on. <br />So, again, I think the Steering Committee did an incredibly fantastic job of patience and <br />everything else to weigh this thing out. I think the CDP makes perfect sense the way it is, and <br />the only thing that bothers me is some of the comments that you will hear about threats—again, <br />this has been brought up a couple times. We won't stand for this; we won't stand for that. And, <br />you know, I just think you need to understand that the developer in this particular case bought it <br />as Industrial. He bought in a Special Management Area. He keeps it in a Special Management <br />Area. He keeps it Industrial. Nothing changes. Nothing changes for him, and that's the way it <br />is. Thank you. <br />K. FORBES: Hi. I'm Ken Forbes from Hakalau. I had a little more here, but I think I can cut it <br />down for you. I just wanted to make one point just to reinforce a lot that has been said at this <br />table. As you know the PONC commission is charged with prioritizing an island -wide list of <br />lands worthy of preservation from development. That's their whole purpose, and the <br />Commission rated Hakalau Point highly, and the County Council voted to make an offer to <br />purchase. The purchase didn't work out, and I have no problem with that. That just didn't work <br />out, but my point is that the commission's finding and this community view that we're <br />presenting to you is saying much the same thing. This is property that's worthy of preservation, <br />and the petitions on Hakalau Point done at the time indicated that as well, about 600. Thank you. <br />S. FORBES: I'll be very brief. This is our 42nd meeting dealing with the Hamakua Community <br />Development Plan. We've looked at issues from all sides and heard many, many views and <br />worked out hard points. There has been great consistency over time. I've said that before. I <br />would just say one of the things that we took into account was Hawaii State laws as it relates to <br />Coastal Zone Management, and I know you've heard a special presentation on that, but there is a <br />particular section under program objectives and policies. It says encourage those developments <br />that are not coastal dependent to locate in inland areas, and that's what we've been seeking <br />related to Hakalau Point and other coastal areas. <br />So, that's all I have to say, and I thank you all for your attention to this. <br />CLARKSON: Thank you, all. Are there any questions of these testifiers from any <br />Commissioner? If not, thank you. Please be seated. I just want to remind everyone that this <br />isn't the last chance for you to testify. From here, whatever comes out of this meeting today, <br />hearing today, it would go to the County Council for their consideration. You can all make your <br />case again before the Council, and then at subsequent hearings on SMA's, rezones, so I'm going <br />to assure you that there's plenty of opportunity to make you case whichever way you feel about <br />EXHIBIT D <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.