Laserfiche WebLink
MELOW: Good evening. I'm Susan Melow. My family and I live on a small farm mauka of <br />Hakalau. I'm here to voice my support of the Hakalau [sic] Community Development Plan. <br />This evening I am reminded of a similar event I attended in 1977 while living on the Island of <br />Lanai. Dole Pineapple was introducing its plan to allow a hotel chain to build a resort complex <br />on the only accessible beach on the island. Despite the platitudes of Dole's executives, the <br />audience, many of whom were Native Hawaiians, could connect the dots. The increase in the <br />number of tourists would mean the need for tour busses and shuttles, not found on the island up <br />to that time, and imported hotel staff would generate the need for additional housing and services <br />thereby crippling an infrastructure design to support an island -wide population of less than 1,000 <br />persons. The list goes on. Most importantly, though, a Hawaiian way of life would be gone. <br />Lanai locals were certain hotel guests paying a premium dollar for staying at such an exclusive <br />location, weren't going to share the small beach with farm workers and their families who had <br />four generations spent their evenings on the beach, talking story, paddling canoe, making music, <br />throwing balls for the kids and some pretty gnarly looking poi dogs. Over the objections of the <br />people of Lanai, we know these changes did eventually come. Change is inevitable. But, we <br />have an opportunity now to set a course for the future we want. The CDP codifies my vote to <br />keep country country. There are too few rural farming communities remaining in the islands, <br />and I believe the emphasis within the CDP to sustain the agricultural nature of the Hamakua <br />Coast to be the right course. The CDP embraces lessons learned from the past, and the current <br />thinking of community planners. Developments should take place within our current towns and <br />villages along with the need to improve parks and areas for recreation activities. Let's aim for a <br />future where the natural beauty, pristine environment and rural nature, the Hawaiian style of the <br />Hamakua region, can be enjoyed by future generations and visitors alike. Thinking back of what <br />happened on Lanai, and our gathering here tonight, I wish to know the difference. While <br />residents of Lanai had voices, they had no clout because, not the residents—because Dole, not <br />the residents, owned the land. My family owns our land, and our tax dollars support the County <br />government. I'm, therefore, looking to my County to expeditiously put into place the Hamakua <br />CDP. Much Mahalo. <br />CLARKSON: Thank you all. Any questions for these testifiers from any of the Commission? I, <br />I would like to ask Mr. Carvalho toI was kind of surprised and shocked actually that you feel <br />that the Steering Committee was not, or maybe I'm paraphrasing this wrong, you feel that the <br />Steering Committee was not allowed to review the suggested changes from the Planning <br />Department and make any objection to them before it became presented to us as an action item. <br />CARVALHO: It was presented, it was sent out and then it was, went over it. There was some <br />discussion where I brought up the issue of "shall" and "should." But, we were not allowed to <br />vote. And, we also, I also requested for time to digest the proposed changes and what the <br />Planning Department, information the Planning Department had provided us, and that, and to <br />have another meeting probably, and that was, we were not given that time to, that was not <br />granted. And, then there was no vote to accept or reject the proposed changes by the Planning <br />Department. And, we were under the impression, the Committee was under the impression, I <br />should say, that we would have an opportunity to review the changes from the, when they went <br />over the procedure, they told us the Planning Department and Corp. Counsel would look at it, <br />and send back a draft, but,we were under the impression that we would have a chance to digest <br />EXHIBIT A <br />17 <br />