My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1999-05-12 Charter Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
1999-05-12 Charter Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 3:56:20 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 3:56:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HAWAII COUNTY CHARTER COMMISSIONPage 21 of 37 <br />only in favor of it if you went to single member, so you didn’t want it -. Rather than have an if and only <br />if type of question on the ballot, which people have enough trouble dealing with the kinds of questions <br />that they get, but one that would only -, the two years -. The other way of doing it, the way to break it <br />apart would be to say that only if single member passes, we would then -, are you then in favor of <br />having two years? There’s also a way, and I won’t explain how to do this, but there was a way of setting <br />it up so that it would almost guarantee both of them have lost, you know, where you have multiple kinds <br />of things that you have to check on. <br />So this comes up and, you know, the -, my approach always is, you know, you don’t -, you present it to <br />people, you let them vote on it, you win or you lose, and you don’t try to rig the ballot. But, you know, it <br />can be done, and if you go back to -, and there’s a court case on this where the first, the first Charter was <br />voted on back in May -, right when Shunichi Kimura was the County Chair. The way the ballot was set <br />up was that there were, and I don’t remember exactly how it was done, but there were three or four <br />alternatives, and there were inconsistencies in them, and if you didn’t -, and unless one out of four got <br />over 50 percent, then there wasn’t going to be a Charter. And I think, perhaps, coincidentally or not, this <br />was a period where the Charter was -. Before this, the County Clerk was elected, and after the Charter <br />called for the County Clerk to be appointed, then the County Clerk set up how the ballot was going to be <br />on the Charter. <br />HIGASHI: So -. <br />YUEN: That’s a long answer to your question. <br />HIGASHI: So in the final end. <br />YUEN: Yeah. <br />HIGASHI: Did the Commission formulate the specific question? <br />YUEN: Right. Right. <br />HIGASHI: Okay. <br />YUEN: The Commission will formulate how the thing is worded on the ballot and if any proposals are <br />joined together. <br />HIGASHI: And as to form, the County Clerk decided -. <br />YUEN: Right. <br />HIGASHI: How the questions were bunched together or were left independent? <br />YUEN: The County Clerk, basically, last time, did not let the Commission join certain questions <br />together and forced them all to be -. <br />HIGASHI: Is it now your opinion that -? <br />YUEN: Broken apart. <br />HIGASHI: What is permissible? I mean, you meant through this once. Do you think -? <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 5-12-99.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.