My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1999-07-07 Charter Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
1999-07-07 Charter Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 4:01:05 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 4:00:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 14 of 23 <br />let’s do publicly funded elections. Maybe we could try it with the Boards and Commissions and since <br />it’s the County’s business, the campaigning could be restricted to statements of positions and <br />qualifications which are published by the County Clerk and sent to every registered voter. I think that <br />this is done. I’m actually surprised that here in Hawaii we do not get a sample ballot with all the <br />initiatives and all of the referendums and the recalls and all of the candidates. We never see that. It’s not <br />mailed to us by the Elections Office. We have to look in the newspapers for the political ads and there is <br />some, maybe a League of Womens Voters will have position papers or at least put out people’s positions <br />but to have it official, it wouldn’t cost that much to have the particular positions and qualifications of <br />people and maybe public forums. You want to be elected to the Board or Commmission, you come <br />before your community and if we had a single one, and I would go for the single member districts. <br />Follow the single member districts. It makes more sense than trying to have three from Kohala even <br />though there could be a conflict and we have found that the people in Kohala might be opposed to the <br />people in North Kohala and South Kohala because they both want to use the same water, or at least they <br />think they do. But I would think it’s simpler to keep it with the single member district. Appointees or <br />elections and that just streamlines the whole shebang. <br />I think it seems like the balance of power is heavily swung toward the Mayor’s side and I would like to <br />see it swing back a little bit and I think by changing the method of electing or appointing the Boards and <br />Commissions, that would help to balance, not only the balance of power but also increase the diversity <br />of representation. And I think that diversity of representation is really important for gatherings. As John <br />knows and maybe I guess no one else does, I facilitate a group for the Kohala Forest Management <br />Group actually right here in this room on various Thursday evenings and it’s really a good process to <br />have the different viewpoints at the table and I participate in the Waimea Water Round Table as well so <br />it’s workable and it doesn’t have to be adversarial and I think with practice and a properly designed <br />Charter, will do a lot to both increase representation and change the balance to more of a balance and <br />that’s really what I’m trying to encourage you to try to design into the Charter. <br />The public discussion I mentioned. The Manager’s salary, if it’s $200,000 a year, to me if it turns out <br />that it’s a better way to manage our County, it’s a very small - the increment from the $65,000 or the <br />$85,000 or whatever the Mayor gets, to make that next jump, is a drop in the bucket compared to the <br />importance of getting an efficient representative, an accountable County government. It’s a small price <br />to pay for that and we can afford it and I would actually say that we can’t afford not to do it. If it does <br />offer it, and I don’t know that it does, but I think it’s something that we really ought to think about and <br />we ought to have the discussion in the public arena and only then, with an informed electorate, can we <br />really decide. <br />ARTICLE III, LEGISLATIVE BRANCH, COUNTY COUNCIL, Section 3-16 <br />So I have under <br />Mandatory Program Review <br />. It is my understanding that this Mandatory Program Review is not <br />taking place as it’s stated in the Charter that it shall be done and so I don’t know. I think it’s a good idea <br />that programs should be reviewed. I see a problem with enforcement. Then how do you compel the <br />County Council. I think it’s their job, right? It’s their job to do it so how do you compel the County <br />Council to do their job? I don’t know but maybe that - <br />RAY: I think it’s more a question of resources and logistics that - <br />HERKES: And priorities. <br />BOCHE: Yes, you know better than I and so I’m just saying what I read in the Charter and I see it not <br />happening so I don’t know. <br />ARTICLE IVEXECUTIVE BRANCH <br />, the , I’m for the proposal to be put on the ballot to replace the <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 7-7-99.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.