Laserfiche WebLink
Page 20 of 23 <br />BESS: I understand your comments with regard to trying to bring about more diversity on the <br />Commission but I’m talking about now your comments with regard to supervision. <br />BOCHE: Okay. <br />BESS: And that’s what’s confusing me. <br />BOCHE: I’m not sure how it would work. <br />BESS: See, I think one of the things, and not to unfairly extrapolate on what you said previously about <br />how we should provide for maximum discussion or what have you but I think when you look at this <br />Charter, it comes from a very traditional viewpoint that (a) we have an Executive Branch that is <br />primarily responsible for administration and we have this Council Branch that’s supposed to be policy <br />formulation and that there’s some how or other, a separation of the two and that by building in the <br />administration into one of those branches, that you have greater accountability. And what I’m hearing <br />you say is that, and it may relate to your feelings about better balance of power, that the Council should <br />have administrative functions as well as policy making functions. <br />BOCHE: Yes, I’m not sure. I’ll have to think about it and I think that’s one of the things that maybe I’ll <br />take away from this meeting are your ideas for further consideration of my own. I can go back and read <br />this and think about it because, as I say, I’ve got a couple of different ideas here about how the Boards <br />and Commissions should be appointed and I’m not really set in stone. I’m just exploring, really trying to <br />explore various ways to create a better County government. <br />BESS: Thank you. <br />BOCHE: That’s all. <br />RAY: Just try to think practically how that would work from an administrative standpoint, if you put the <br />legislative body in that loop to make administrative decisions on how these departments function and I <br />think that’s the point that Steve was bringing up. How that would work. <br />Okay, any more questions. <br />MARTIN: Yes, I have a comment. Maybe I shouldn’t be saying this but you made mention of a group of <br />people per se, being higher up in the rankings of a department. If any one group participates or applies <br />itself more than another and they do in fact, proceed up the ladder, if you will, it’s to their good luck I <br />think and I just would be wary of comment something like that. Yes? <br />BOCHE: Yes, I don’t disagree with you in the best of worlds. I think either explanation is equally valid <br />in any given specific case. People can advance by hard work, diligence, qualifications, in one system if <br />the system is well designed and functioning in accountable system and if it’s not, they can advance by <br />other means. And that’s all I’m saying and I’m not pointing my finger at any particular group. <br />RAY: Okay, thanks Ken. Lesley, you had a comment? <br />PATTON: I have a small technical question and a comment. The technical question was is there any <br />stipulation or guideline for this Commission to come up with up to maximum proposed amendments or <br />recommended or anything? <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 7-7-99.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />