My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1999-08-11 Charter Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
1999-08-11 Charter Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 4:04:18 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 4:04:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HAWAII COUNTY CHARTER COMMISSIONPage 5 of 33 <br />ahead and go through the Corporation Counsel section of the Charter, so page 8, CHAPTER 2 <br />CORPORATION COUNSEL. Mr. Wurdeman was here during the initial Department Review and he <br />furnished us with suggestions for Charter changes so there were a number of them, just a couple that are <br />applicable to this section, so I’d like to ask Mr. Wurdeman to go over those. Mr. Wurdeman. <br />WURDEMAN: The first is sort of a housekeeping matter. We suggest that language be added that "The <br />Corporation Counsel could delegate any professional legal duties of his office to his Assistant or <br />Deputies." That’s the practice and that’s never been challenged but we feel it might be appropriate to put <br />it in so we won’t be challenged. <br />Special Counsel <br />Second item is somewhat difficult to explain and it relates to . In this case, it’s when, as <br />often happens, we are required to provide representation both for the County, as an entity, and an <br />employee or sometimes more than one employee. For example, Police Department. Under State law, the <br />Police Commission is given the authority to decide whether in a given case, a police officer is operating <br />within the course of scope of his employment so as to warrant government paid counsel and they do this. <br />Sometimes they do it in strange ways. There was a case that occurred about five years ago where they <br />found that an officer who got into a fight in a cocktail lounge and broke somebody’s jaw off duty, was in <br />the course of scope of his employment. So in cases like that, we feel that’s it’s in the County’s interest, <br />and we should argue that this person was acting on his own and not as an employee to protect the <br />County. Obviously at that point, we have a conflict. We are required to provide counsel but on the other <br />hand, we feel that to protect the public treasury, we have to disclaim the employee’s actions. In that <br />case, it’s been mandated by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, we must hire an outside counsel so we <br />go to the County Council and we ask for "special counsel" to represent the employee so that we can <br />represent the County. The County Council has, in the past, been very cooperative and has generally <br />approved such requests. Just a month or so ago, we went in on a request for an employee who was being <br />sued for having allegedly indecently exposed himself to a young girl. We felt, as the County, that we <br />were obligated to say that whatever he did or didn’t do was not done as an employee. In this case, it was <br />not a policeman but it was a person covered by Union Contract and Union Contracts have much the <br />same language as the law relating to policemen. The Council turned us down. I don’t know what the end <br />result of that is going to be. The Union will probably have something to say about that, but the point is <br />that I think it’s a good idea that we have Council approval when we hire "special counsel" to represent <br />the County. But that’s a good control on just willy-nilly hiring lawyers out but when we do, in these, not <br />all that common but is somewhat common, cases where we are forced by law or Union Contract to <br />provide a lawyer for an individual who may not have been loyally serving the County at the time, that <br />we should do so without having to go to Council for they might turn us down. For example, if the Police <br />Commission required that counsel be provided in a certain case and the Council turned us down, which <br />has never happened although they threatened to, we’d be in a real fix. I mean, we wouldn’t know where <br />to turn next. There’d be a dilemma there so our request is that "special counsel" be defined as "counsel <br />retained to represent the County" and not include in the definition those cases where we have to hire <br />people to represent individuals. That’s pretty complex stuff and I’m sure there’s questions and I’ll be <br />glad to answer them. <br />RAY: Ms. Irvine. <br />IRVINE: I wonder why should it take two-thirds a vote of the County Council for you to hire an outside <br />person in the first place, for any reason? <br />WURDEMAN: I don’t know. That’s what it currently reads. <br />HERKES: So if you’re caught in between the Union and the Council - <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 8-11-99.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.