Laserfiche WebLink
minutes 10-27-99Page 4 of 48 <br />RAY: Second? <br />YOSHIYAMA: Second. <br />RAY: Okay. Any discussion? All in favor? <br />COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br />RAY: Minutes approved. <br />Financial Status Report: It’s unchanged since the last report we made. <br />Communications. This is in your packet you received today. There’s a memorandum from the County <br />Clerk in regard to Election Deadlines; a copy of a newspaper article from Publisher Jim Wilson, <br />Tribune-Herald; an article that I had copied from the American City and County Magazine; ACLU <br />Guidelines from Mr. Coco Pierson, that he furnished us with; and a copy of the exhaustive minutes from <br />our marathon session in Waimea, which I’m sure you’ll enjoy reading over the next week or so. <br />Additionally, we did pass out, at the start of the meeting, a couple of written communications from our <br />attorney, Mr. Yuen, in regard to items that came up at the last meeting, as well as I want to thank Sue <br />Irvine for the research she did in regard to some of the same issues, Initiative and Referendum, and so, <br />anyway, we can all read that and digest it, and we’ll agendize it for future discussion. <br />Moving on to Unfinished Business. A, B, and C, the Department of Water Supply, Water Commission, <br />and Public Works. All are agendized to really encompass one major issue, and this is a verbal <br />recommendation, initiative, that was put forth by the Administration, in late spring of this year. The idea <br />of transferring the Division of, or possibly some of the functions of, the County Wastewater Division, <br />which is under the Public Works Department to the Department of Water Supply, and to look into how <br />partially, or in whole, that relationship might work. I know that the Water Department and the Water <br />Commission have been spending a lot of time discussing that, and they’re both here, as well as the head <br />of the Wastewater Division from Public Works, Mr. Peter Boucher. So, I don’t know how you want to <br />handle this, who wants to come up first. We have testimony in writing from Mr. Pavao, so you want to <br />lead in with that? You want to bring anybody else up to table, that’s fine. Please introduce yourself and <br />speak into the microphone so we can get all this recorded. <br />PAVAO: Good afternoon. My name is Milton Pavao. I’m Manager for the Department of Water Supply. <br />With me, here today, is our Water Commission Chairman, Mr. John Souza; my Deputy Manager, Mr. <br />Quirino Antonio; and our Finance Division Head, Richard Tsunoda. So, if you have questions, they can <br />be directed to them, as well. <br />I’m here today to speak against the proposed Charter Amendment that would transfer the Wastewater <br />Division to the Department of Water Supply. As Chairman Ray said, I have submitted two separate <br />documents. One is a letter and one is a list of pros and cons. While it’s not my intent to read either one <br />of them, I’d like to kind of highlight some of the things that I think should be mentioned. When we first <br />saw the proposed Charter Amendment, the reasons given were that this would make enforceable sewer <br />billing, and would make possible, initiatives for the use of recycled water, for appropriate purposes. On <br />the issue of enforceable sewer billings, we have been meeting with the Sewer Department for about two <br />years now, to accomplish just this, and we’re at a point where we have a common understanding of what <br />we’ll do and how we’ll help the Sewer Department. Right now, because of the computer system that we <br />have in place, we cannot physically include sewer billings on our bill. As you notice, those that do get <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 10-27-99.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />