Laserfiche WebLink
minutes 12-04-99Page 12 of 39 <br />RAY: Opposed? <br />2 COMMISSIONERS: Nay. <br />RAY: Two? <br />HERKES: I just want to point out that the two Kona people voted for this. While you’re saying Kona will be against it, we <br />both voted for it. <br />RAY: That’s good. <br />KUROZAWA: I want to say something real quick. I did vote for it but, my feeling about these things, is that the people <br />should vote, and I don’t want to stonewall things as a Commissioner, thinking even if they’re going to vote against it, that’s <br />fine. But I think the people should have a say. <br />HIGASHI: Opportunity to vote, yes. <br />SANTANGELO: The question is, I voted, not based on what a few people are, maybe, going to come in here and beat up on <br />it. I think the good doctor stated it very clearly. But, as we go along, if other information comes up, this isn’t written in stone <br />yet. Or is this pretty much we’re going to put this up and we’re going to fine tune it? <br />RAY: I think this is the strong will of the Commission at this point, to put this up, and that’s the way it should be presented. <br />HIGASHI: That’s right. <br />RAY: I don’t think we should be willy nilly about things. <br />BESS: Exactly. Bite the bullet. <br />SANTANGELO: I’d like to make a quick comment then. If you’ll look at it, where it points to the terms of Council <br />members, it should say - second line - One member shall be elected from each of the six ‘single’ member districts. That <br />should be put in there, and then later on, it says for member elected in the six ‘single" member districts, because it states ‘at- <br />large’ but it doesn’t say ‘single’ member, and that’s going to be a big thing when it comes to perception. <br />RAY: Okay, as with everything else, I think we’ll have to have our attorney - so maybe Roland can get together with Chris <br />and get him to come up with some proposed language that we have in the file, that exactly reflects the best language. <br />HIGASHI: And it also reflects that we’re using six State House of Representative districts as a guideline, if it’s lawful, so <br />that we don’t have to wait for the <br />Reapportionment Commission. <br />RAY: Okay. Marni. <br />HERKES: My feeling, on these votes, is that if we’re voting for or against it, so long as nothing else comes up on it, so that if <br />we want to take it up again, then we can vote again. It’s just like everything else. You can change your mind. Right? <br />RAY: Right. We will have final votes, officially, on all of these. Okay, good. Making some progress. On non-partisan, I think <br />it was agreed that we don’t need to revisit that at this point in time. <br />Term limits, as a separate ballot amendment. Do we have any discussion on that? <br />HIGASHI: We yield to you. You had some strong feelings on that. <br />HERKES: My very strong feeling is that term limits are up to the electorate, and I don’t like government meddling in my <br />opportunity to elect, or not elect, an official. <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 12-04-99.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />