My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1999-12-04 Charter Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
1999-12-04 Charter Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 4:12:31 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 4:12:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
minutes 12-04-99Page 3 of 39 <br />fundamentally, we need to answer that. Is this somebody that would be hired by the Council and basically, the Mayor would <br />then be more the Council chair, or would be considerably less - certainly wouldn’t be the CEO of the County. Is that what <br />you envisioned, so that we basically do away with the strong mayor form of government? Is that what you’re suggesting? <br />HERKES: I like the Lexington model that we did first where the top vote getter is the head of the Council and the Mayor, and <br />then the Council manages the government and, with that person, they hire the Managing Director who is a professional. <br />I’d like to comment on John’s township or structure. We did a thing with the League of Women Voters and AAUW. We had <br />four speakers on different kinds of government, and the lady that came from Minnesota, that was on a township board - she <br />had done a lot of research on townships and found that townships are dying. Bigger entities are swallowing them up. That <br />was a shock to us because we were headed down this road and found out there isn’t anybody in front of you. There is an <br />opportunity for every community to have their own neighborhood board, and I’d like to call attention to the Waimea <br />Community Association, as a leader in that particular effort. And you’ll say they can’t vote on things; they have all the power <br />of the voting. Government comes to the Waimea Community Association and says how shall we do this. Help us through <br />this. As my role as the head of the Chamber, government comes to me and said this is what we want to do; how do we do <br />this? We don’t, necessarily, with a 150,000 people, need a structure. It wouldn’t be bad to have. I’m not against it. I’m not <br />against neighborhood boards. But I think the opportunity is there now. We don’t have to have that structure written in. That’s <br />the thing I see coming down the line in the Charter. <br />I’d like to call your attention to the fact that 2 years is probably the length of planning stage that any business goes through <br />these days. Five years is way long range visioning. When you’re talking about ten years, it’ll be a whole different world. We <br />don’t know what our population’s going to be. In the census, I would guess a 150,000. So, when we get up to half a million, <br />then I think we start looking at different government structures, and I pick that number out of the air. But I think, right now, <br />there just aren’t that many people that we need to have a structured community government. The opportunity’s there. <br />Waimea Community Association is the neighborhood board for this area. <br />SANTANGELO: But for a point of information, again, we’re talking about City Manager, because I think we could talk and <br />use exactly what you said to build a case for the opposite. But in this City Manager type thing, you said the top vote getter is <br />either the head of the council - <br />HERKES: I said I liked that. <br />SANTANGELO: So, we have single member districts which are very, very different - <br />HERKES: Or 3-6. <br />SANTANGELO: As Waimea is different from Ka’u, in terms of a neighborhood board, or something. I mean, they’re very, <br />very different single members. So, if you’re talking about a top vote getter, then we have nine single members and the top <br />vote getter would be an individual - <br />RAY: Let me just interject. We alluded to the Lexington model, and the way the Lexington model works is the top at-large <br />vote getter is the Council Chair, and the Mayor is elected separately, and he attended the Council meetings. <br />HERKES: I wasn’t sure about that, but we don’t have to follow it all the way through. <br />RAY: No. <br />HERKES: As long as the top vote getter chairs the Council and he’s the ceremonial Mayor. Who needs a Mayor? <br />HIGASHI: With the strong mayor system, we need the Mayor. <br />RAY: That’s one view. Sue. <br />IRVINE: I just feel that we can work this out without radically changing to a Council Manager form of government, by <br />possibly beefing up the qualifications for our Managing Director. I was very down on Council Manager until this. Riverside, <br />California has a very simple Charter, and they really do seem to be happy with their Council Manager, but I don’t think we’re <br />ready for it here yet. <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 12-04-99.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.