|
minutes 12-08-99Page 13 of 31
<br />situation where the Chief wants, and you want, as a Commission, how would you see that being settled, as far as sending it
<br />for budget review, sending it to the legislators to have it be considered? How do you see that being settled? Who’d have the
<br />power?
<br />J. HERKES: First of all, we’d like to have that challenge. I think it is a matter of is the Chief voicing his personal opinion as
<br />to how, or what, legislation should be done for policy making, or is he adhering to what the County wants.
<br />MARTIN: What’s in the best interest of the County is what you’re trying to say.
<br />J. HERKES: Exactly.
<br />MARTIN: Again, understood that, but if you have this power, and there’s a difference of opinion, how are you going to settle
<br />it?
<br />J. HERKES: Who does the Police Chief work for?
<br />MARTIN: He works for the County, but that’s kind of a redundant question. After he’s hired, isn’t it his department to run?
<br />J. HERKES: To administer policy that had been set, that’s his job. An entity, or a Commission like this one, which I believed
<br />the original intent was to set forth that policy, to give him direction. Not to interfere with any officer that, perhaps, my
<br />personal opinion, if I said you’re out of uniform and you’re on duty; that’s interfering administratively. But, to set general
<br />policy so that we are in tune with what the goals are of our Police Department.
<br />MARTIN: I understand what you’re saying. Possibly, I even agree there should be some movement in the book, as it’s
<br />written, to do what you’re saying, but the problem I’m having is how are you going to settle dispute, if it comes to that.
<br />SCHEELE: I don’t know how we’d settle it. I would think that the Commission should be the one who has the final say, as a
<br />Board of Directors.
<br />MARTIN: Okay, thank you.
<br />RAY: John.
<br />SANTANGELO: Again, I go back to, as far as the budget goes, it occurs to me, and we’ve done this with other things in non-
<br />profits, one way that that could be fixed is if, through an arbitration process, we got a figure that says that the Police
<br />Commission’s budget shall not exceed a certain amount of the entire Police budget. And that way, you’re guaranteed, as you
<br />submit your budget, as long as you’re under the cap, and the tendency is to go to the max, and that would have to be set
<br />prudently, then you would have a little more control of your ship. But if we go back to a performance based, and I understand
<br />what Mr. Martin was bringing up, but just like in the $12 million credit union that I’m president of, we set policy and budget.
<br />We hire a Chief Executive. We cannot micro manage any other employee in that credit union, but we look for the flags, we
<br />look for the standards, and we look for the performance standards to say are you on track. If not, what’s wrong and how can
<br />we adjust it. That’s a policy. And then, that Chief Executive job depends on that. So, the dispute is easily settled. Do it and do
<br />it right, or hit the road. And the way you do it and do it right is by these performance based standards, you’ve got a track
<br />record that you can then dismiss or renew a contract, and it’s based on something. So then if you have that with your Chief,
<br />you’ve got this person’s attention and, it seems like, the rest of the letter of the law, because figures don’t lie, but liars use
<br />figures. Sometimes you get rulings that back up a certain fiefdom or something, and it just seems to me that may create more
<br />accountability. And, again, it’s awful simple so maybe it’s not the right solution, but again, I bring it back to that because it
<br />seems to work a whole lot of other places.
<br />SCHEELE: I don’t know that we have the solutions. We’re here for ya’ll to have the solutions.
<br />SANTANGELO: The question comes back, and you both are nodding your heads, so it sounds like it’s great, but why can’t
<br />you do that now, and if not, how can we fix that?
<br />J. HERKES: By listening to our suggestions as to how we can change the Charter. And, this has nothing to do with
<br />personalities now. Look all the way up until the next ten years that we can change the Charter again. So, if the language is
<br />there and it’s black and white, very clear and no gray areas, which we see right now, then there should be no question as to
<br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 12-08-99.html7/1/2011
<br />
<br />
|