Laserfiche WebLink
minutes 02-09-00Page 7 of 41 <br />win-win situation there. <br />One point - I don’t know if this has been made and I don’t mean to bring this up as some very controversial thing, but a <br />number of Native Hawaiians came before the Council over the years, and talked to us about the jurisdictional issue of the <br />Department of Hawaiian Homelands, and the section in the Charter regarding the geographical limits. And, it says the entire <br />Island of Hawaii. And it doesn’t say excluding the sovereign lands of the Department of Hawaiian Homelands. I’m not trying <br />to raise a red flag here. It’s just something that I wrote in my Charter. Is this something that we’ve got to look at? I don’t <br />know. <br />RAY: We did. <br />TYLER: Did you? Okay. <br />RAY: It was brought to our attention. <br />TYLER: And I don’t see nonpartisan on here. You’re already going to go forward on that. <br />RAY: Right. <br />TYLER: And nonpartisans are not tied to - It’s a - <br />MARTIN: Stand alone. <br />TYLER: It’s a stand alone Amendment, right? Okay. I congratulate you on that. I’m glad to know that it’s coming forward. I <br />hope that’ll pass. I think people will find that to make government more efficient. And as someone who plans to run for re- <br />election, if it makes the whole financial process simpler and cheaper, I’m all for it. <br />And obviously the typos and things like that are going to be corrected. We don’t have to - <br />YUEN: It does not need a Charter Amendment. Those can be corrected, some of them at least, in the printing process, and <br />they can be corrected the next time it’s printed. <br />TYLER: All right. I don’t mean to have this rear it’s ugly head here but the Mandatory Program Review thing, you’re not <br />going to mess with that, or what? <br />RAY: Nothing’s proposed at this time. <br />TYLER: Okay, well, thank you for leaving it in our lap. Anyhow, I understand the difficulty. I’m happy to answer any <br />questions if anyone has any. I appreciate the opportunity to - <br />RAY: Ms. Herkes. <br />HERKES: I’d like to go back to the Public Safety Commission. Maui has a Public Safety Commission. They only have the <br />Fire Department under it though. I have to qualify that statement every time I make it. But that is something I would like to <br />see, a Public Safety Department with a Commission overseeing, with the Fire Department, the Police Department, Civil <br />Defense, Emergency Services, Animal Control, Building Inspection. We could put a whole bunch of stuff under Safety, <br />ordinances and laws that are passed to protect the safety of our residents. That’s not something the Commission, however, <br />has seen fit to advance so we may leave that to future Charter Commissions. But it would have a Commission. I don’t want <br />you to get the feeling that the Commissions were being abolished, but I think we’ll probably be recommending a Fire <br />Commission and a Police Commission. <br />TYLER: Okay. Well, we already have a Police Commission so it’s simpler to go with one than to changing all the language. <br />And I think one of the most difficult tasks before us all, as voters, number one, and number two, you as Commissioners, is to <br />figure out is that going to be presented to the public, to the electorate, so they can understand this, instead of saying I’m going <br />to leave this thing blank. We don’t want to see a lot of blank votes. I could stand before you here and come up with a hundred <br />different things that need to be changed there, but if people just, kind of, throw this thing in the wastebasket, or say oh, I’m <br />voting no on everything, or I’m going to leave it blank, well, this is not accomplishing anything. So I think it’s far better for <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 02-09-00.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />