Laserfiche WebLink
minutes 03-08-00Page 15 of 35 <br />HENRY: Right. The other thing is if we want to put this on website, you need to tell me when it’s at the place that you feel <br />comfortable putting it on, and then I’ll need the diskette or to retype it. <br />RAY: Okay. <br />HERKES: I would feel comfortable putting it on now. We’re going to take it to public hearing on Saturday. I mean, what’s <br />the difference? <br />IRVINE: I agree. <br />RAY: Chris, what do you think? <br />YUEN: Actually, I think maybe we should decide that after we go through it right now, and we see how close we are, <br />because there are a few things in here, and I’ve tried to highlight them at the top, where the Commission has not actually <br />voted on it, and usually it involved a fairly fine point, but still I tried to point out where things had been changed. And so, <br />that’s why I’m a little cautious about putting this out, as being official. To be honest with you, I think the summary really <br />does state the important points pretty well, and cover it, and there are people who want to see exactly what’s, and I don’t <br />blame them, and I agree with that, and certainly in the end, we’ve got to have something. But at this point, let’s go through it, <br />and without necessarily this being the exact language, if there are things that people do have concerns about in the language <br />being what the Commission wants to do, then let’s not put it out yet. Maybe we’d not put out some of them if that is a <br />problem. <br />RAY: Okay, let’s keep going. 4. The Fire Commission. <br />YUEN: Maybe it’d be helpful if I pointed out a couple of things on these as we go through. <br />RAY: Okay. <br />YUEN: The Fire Commission, what I have here, follows very closely Gary’s draft which the Commission voted on and there <br />was all that language in there. What is different here from that draft, and was done because there was a discussion about <br />doing this by the Commission, was change the language as far as the removal of the Chief, and the net effect of this change in <br />language is it makes it easier to remove the Fire Chief than the language in the Honolulu Charter. Instead of saying a <br />statement of charges, it says a ‘statement of reasons’ and then it says ‘the fire chief must be allowed to respond’ actually <br />before they vote to remove the chief, and the difference in the Honolulu Charter, it says that opportunity for a hearing before <br />they remove, and I think that creates a bigger procedure, a more difficult procedure. And I thought the sense of the <br />Commission was to try to streamline it a little bit at the last meeting, but the Commission has not actually voted on this <br />particular language that I have in here on removing the chief. <br />The second thing that I added, and I changed a little bit from Gary’s draft, was the transition, on what happens between now <br />and then. And it’s to make it clear, first of all, and I think this was just something that was understood in the previous draft, <br />was that this takes effect when there’s a changeover in the composition of the County government in December. So, in other <br />words, the Mayor that comes in appoints the new Fire Commission in December. I think that was understood that it wouldn’t <br />be the Mayor in the last month of the term appointing the Fire Commission. The chief who is in office immediately before <br />the turnover, would remain as the chief until the Fire Commission appointed a new chief. <br />HIGASHI: And confirmed by the Council or appointment by the Fire Commission, does he become interim or acting chief? <br />YUEN: Under the procedure on Gary’s draft, and in the Honolulu Charter, there is no confirmation of the Fire Chief by the <br />Council. The Fire Chief is simply appointed by the Fire Commission, so that’s it. Once the Fire Commission appoints the <br />chief - Are you talking about the interim Fire Chief? <br />HIGASHI: Without looking at this in detail, is there a confirmation of the Fire Chief? <br />YUEN: Today there is, yes. <br />HIGASHI: Under the proposal? <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 03-08-00.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />