My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2000-03-25 Charter Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
2000-03-25 Charter Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 3:49:02 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 3:48:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
minutes 03-25-00Page 20 of 34 <br />BARRY: What about all those that have switched the other way around, from strong Mayor to Council/Manager? The <br />statistics on those and the cities. <br />RAY: My understanding is that the trend is going the other way, that more folks are switching away from Council/Manager <br />to strong Mayor form of government at this point in time. <br />BARRY: With the Mayor with no qualifications? Not needing to have any basic - <br />RAY: With the Mayor as the Chief Executive Officer. Anyway, let’s move on. We’ve got a lot of people to testify. <br />BARRY: Okay. <br />OTTERSON: One more thing. When you’ve got close to $200 million, you’ve got a lot of money there that this individual <br />that voted, and that individual that voted - You’ve got to have somebody in there that knows how to run that budget. <br />RAY: That’s why we have a Finance Department and a qualified head of that department, Jim, okay? So, it’s not the Mayor <br />that runs the Finance Department. <br />OTTERSON: But, does he have the papers to do it, or is he just somebody that walked in. Like in Planning Department, <br />that’s a big waste right there. <br />RAY: Okay, I think we understand where you’re coming from. <br />OTTERSON: Okay. <br />RAY: And it’s been well presented. Shannon Rudolph, followed by Ray Moore. <br />RUDOLPH: Aloha. My name is Shannon Rudolph and first, I’d like to thank you all for all the reading, driving, thinking, and <br />overall time you’ve had to spend to be a member of this Commission. And I’d also like to thank you for your web page. I’m <br />sorry half your Commission is missing here today. Sorry that they didn’t think it important to come to Kona. Normally I <br />would go along with any ballot measure that the people have a chance to vote on. What bothers me is the ballot wording. <br />When the ballot wording gets too confusing, many people don’t get the chance to vote the way they think they’re voting, or <br />they leave the measure blank because they don’t understand it. I consider these votes stolen. Many people will never forgive <br />the Hapuna vote; yes means no and no means yes. Please make these ballot measures easily understandable. No hocus-pocus. <br />I think I support non-partisan elections. At least I would be willing to try them. I think I support a professional Managing <br />Director appointed by the Council, and I support the formation of an Environmental Services Department with a <br />professionally qualified Department Head. That goes for Public Works, Water, R&D, etc. I think all Department Heads <br />should be professionally qualified. I support an Environmental Services Commission and all other Commissions as long as <br />Commission members come from each Council district and are confirmed by the Council. I oppose at-large Council seats. I <br />think you’re beating a dead horse with this one. The people have spoken and spoken. I strongly oppose any changes to the <br />Planning Commission unless it’s as an advisory change or an elected Planning Commission. They have way too much power <br />already. Maybe the Council should have the SMA power, not Planning. I’d really like to see a Kona Planning Commission. I <br />strongly oppose any changes to the Initiative, Recall and Impeachment. I support the added measure of Neighborhood Boards <br />and I also support the added measure of an elected Charter Review Commission. This Commission has more responsibility <br />than the other Commissions, and in your minutes you’ve said yourselves, that many people on County Boards and <br />Commissions just keep getting recycled over and over. One excellent way to stop this recycling, and get more people <br />involved in their government, is with an elected Charter Review Commission. Many U.S. counties have an elected Charter <br />Review Commission and I think we should too. It’s really the only fair way to review the Charter. We could also have nine <br />members instead of eleven; one from each district, saving money and saving the at-large problem. If nine people can’t get the <br />job done, then I doubt three more will help. <br />In closing, I’d like to take a quick straw poll to see how many of you would like to see an elected Charter Review <br />Commission on this year’s ballot. Can you raise your hands? Well, we’ve got a few. <br />RAY: You understand that wouldn’t take effect for ten years? <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 03-25-00.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.