My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2000-05-10 Charter Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
2000-05-10 Charter Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 3:55:32 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 3:55:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Transcript of Meeting of May 10, 2000Page 11 of 62 <br />with Hawaiian home lands also. And if it does, put Hawaiian home lands in there then. Put it there. <br />Don’t say the whole island and then when we go to different departments within this county, we have no <br />jurisdiction over Hawaiian home lands. That’s the confusion part that’s sending out the message to the <br />Hawaiians out here that we are second class citizens, third, fourth class citizens. We’re not included in <br />your Charter. That was the language. The language was to help include us and how we can get things <br />done within this county. We sent a letter to the Mayor asking that we be included because about a month <br />ago this question was asked of the Corporation Counsel by Curtis Tyler. Does the County have <br />jurisdiction on Hawaiian home lands? The answer of Gerald Takasi was no. No. And that’s the guy <br />you’re dealing with in your Council, in your Charter. You’re going to make Corporation Counsel, <br />include them – they’re all in here. But the Corporation Counsel says clearly no. We have a decision from <br />Mr. Wurdeman, an Opinion, in a totally unrelated matter, however, he does state this in his Opinion; the <br />Hawaiian Homes Act did not authorize the State or local government to apply a tax lien to Hawaiian <br />home lands. We take away the tax lien to the extent that the real property lien is an incumbrance on the <br />property created by non-administrators of the Act, of the DHHL land. An Act of Congress would be <br />required to attach it to Hawaiian home lands. The Hawaiian Homes Commission Act also embodies <br />express provisions that the Governor – the Governor and the Board of Land and Natural Resources not <br />exercise their powers and duties over lands having the status of Hawaiian home lands. That’s in Section <br />206. This provision evidence a strong intent that Hawaiian home lands not be controlled by State or <br />local governments, but by DHHL. The disposition of Hawaiian home lands by county tax here would be <br />in contradiction of this intent. This is just one avenue. All I’m trying to lead you up to is that it needs to <br />be included in your Charter. It needs to be included. Are we included or are we excluded? Because the <br />Opinion of Mr. Wurdeman is clear, and your counsel agreed to it because he wrote something about it, <br />that provides the incumbrance authorized to be placed on Hawaiian home lands by officers other than <br />those charged with the admission of such Act shall not be increased except for the consent of Congress. <br />That’s basically where we’re at. This County has no consent from Congress to increase the <br />incumbrance. A tax lien is an incumbrance. A building permit is an incumbrance. A zoning change is an <br />incumbrance. It’s been ruled. It’s senseless for us Hawaiians to come here before you, but we do <br />because we’re trying to work within the system. It’s again a notice. I do know that a lot of you, and this <br />counsel that you have – don’t put this on. Don’t put those Hawaiian things in the Charter. Don’t do it. <br />And if you’re prepared to do that, please sign a document saying that you’re not. Then give it to me and <br />I’ll take it somewhere else. Because, again, I go back to your responsibilities. You said you upheld the <br />Constitution, took this job as County Commissioners to review the Charter, and then again ignore us <br />when we come before you. Trust me. You can all say personally no, that’s not what we feel, but that’s <br />how Hawaiians feel. <br />IRVINE: Sir. <br />KAHAWAIOLA’A: Yes. <br />IRVINE: I don’t think we’re ignoring you. <br />KAHAWAIOLA’A: Thank you for your thought. <br />IRVINE: I think we’re doing our best to understand, and it is very, very difficult to understand whether <br />you wish to be part of the County or exempt. I do not feel that I could vote for anything that would not <br />continue to provide Police and Fire protection on Hawaiian homes, and I’m afraid if we exclude you in <br />some sense, or include you in some special sense, that you may lack that help. <br />KAHAWAIOLA’A: Then may I just say that if it was your intentions to do that, please let us know, so <br />we know how to explain it better, if you didn’t understand it. But to ignore us, to ignore us sends that <br />message. It should have been explained. You got counsel here. He knows absolutely what. This is not <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 05-10-00.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.