Laserfiche WebLink
Transcript of Meeting of May 10, 2000Page 24 of 62 <br />IRVINE: What if there’s only two running? Why don’t they just go into the General? <br />YUEN: That’s the way Maui does it. <br />HERKES: They will. Mr. Ray, do we want to vote on non-partisan and then vote on how? <br />SANTANGELO: That’s what we’re doing. No, you have to do it this way. <br />RAY: We have to amend it if we are, and then vote on the motion as amended, if it is. <br />YUEN: Let me clarify this. I’m sorry. The way Maui does it is that if there are only two running, you <br />don’t have an election at all in the Primary. They both run off in the General and the winner wins in the <br />General. If there are three or more running, they do have an election in the Primary, but the top two go <br />over into the General. <br />SANTANGELO: Regardless of one getting a majority? <br />YUEN: Regardless of one getting the 50% plus one. The way the City and County does it is the way that <br />was voted on by the Commission the first time through which is that if you get the 50% plus one, no <br />matter how many are running, if you get that in the first, or Primary, election, you don’t have a race in <br />the second election. If nobody gets 50% plus one, then the top two go over into the General Election. <br />RAY: So, does everybody understand the amendment? The amendment is to vote, basically, as Chris <br />just described, as Sue introduced the method that’s in the Maui County Charter. Okay, we’re going to <br />vote. <br />BESS: No, I’m unclear. Can you state what’s in the Maui County Charter again? What’s on the table <br />here. <br />YUEN: And let me just say one more thing. The way I read Maui, I think their Mayor is still a partisan <br />and their Council is non-partisan, just to throw different wrinkle in there. But what I understand the <br />motion to be, like we had done, we were going to go all non-partisan. The amendment is that if there are <br />only two candidates running for a particular office, that those two candidates will not appear in the first <br />election and they will automatically go to the General, and then the winner wins in the General. If there <br />are three or more candidates running for a particular office, they will be voted on in the first election, <br />and the top two will always go on to the General to be run off, no matter how many more votes one gets <br />than the other. <br />SANTANGELO: I’m going to speak against the amendment simply because, again, there’s been an <br />awful lot of discussion about money, and I know the 15%, and Sue, we both know that in a Presidential <br />election, you get a lot more voters. It goes up and down, and it’s really up to the voters to get off their <br />can. And having been through these elections, I know what it’s like to go through a Primary and then a <br />General, and if the solution is there, if there’s a majority winner which is what we haven’t had in a while <br />for a lot of things, in the Primary then let it be and I would vote against this amendment and go for the <br />original as we had it. And that’s simply a friendly suggestion though. <br />RAY: Further discussion? All in favor of the amendment, raise your right hand. <br />HANDS RAISED: Commissioners Herkes, Irvine, Kurozawa. <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 05-10-00.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />