My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2000-05-31 Charter Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
2000-05-31 Charter Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 3:59:01 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 3:58:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
minutes 05-31-00Page 24 of 54 <br />PRANKE: Jay Kimura ran unopposed. <br />SANTANGELO: Yagong. He won in the primary. Wasn’t put on the general. Wasn’t even on the ballot. <br />RAY: Okay, we beat this one to death? <br />BESS: I’m sorry. Yes, we have beat it but just one other point. Just again focusing on the public and understanding, I don’t <br />know if it’s safe for us to believe that everyone understands what a non-partisan election is but in the proposed language for <br />the ballot, that it be elected in non-partisan elections, I’m just wondering whether it would be clearer to all people if we said <br />that ‘be elected on a non-partisan basis’ and to go one step further and say ‘without regard to political party affiliation’. I <br />don’t know if that makes it any clearer for the public. So, I don’t have a hang up about it but that’s a thought. <br />YUEN: Are you meaning – <br />BESS: I’m looking at your proposed language for ballot. <br />YUEN: For the ballot. <br />BESS: Yes. You say ‘be elected in non-partisan elections’ and I’m just trying to put it so that there is no question about what <br />we’re talking about here for all the public. <br />YUEN: Actually, I have no pride of authorship as far as the Ballot Questions and I want the Commission members to discuss, <br />really, how – I put this out as a draft, as a basis for discussion. I can see saying this a little bit differently. You could say <br />‘non-partisan election with no party identification on the ballot’. I said that in the Digest to make that a little fuller. In stating <br />the Ballot Question, there’s a trade off between making it brief and making it complete, and I went toward brief in what I did <br />rather than toward complete in the drafts. <br />RAY: That’s not much of an addition to add that language in the Question, to add that language in that section. <br />BESS: That’s what I’m saying. <br />HERKES: I like that language. <br />SANTANGELO: So that would be inserted at ‘be elected without regard to political affiliation in non-partisan elections’. Is <br />that what you’re saying, something like that? Just insert that part right there? <br />BESS: I said ‘be elected on a non-partisan basis without regard to political party affiliation’. <br />RAY: But to put that in the Question language, ‘shall all County officers’, not in the – <br />BESS: Yes, it’s not in the substance; in the proposed language for – <br />IRVINE: What if you just said ‘non-partisan’ – <br />RAY: Right, so to add it in the Question. <br />YUEN: I understand that’s what he wants to do. I don’t think it’s necessary to put it in the Charter to explain that because <br />that’s– <br />BESS: No, I don’t want it in the Charter. <br />YUEN: The Ballot Question is whatever people feel is the best language. <br />RAY: We’re not reviewing the Ballot Questions yet. Keep that in mind when we get to them. <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 05-31-00.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.