Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />brainstorming sessions, the meeting following the two brainstorming sessions to select the <br />attorney? <br />RAY: I would feel comfortable if we had our attorney on board, you know, for a <br />couple of reasons. Number one, I'd like that person to be involved and get the input, and number <br />two, you know, we're talking about a couple of pretty lengthy sessions, and you know, that's sort <br />of an imposition on Corporation Counsel, as well, if we can get somebody on board sooner rather <br />than later but -. Does that seem realistic from your standpoint? When do you think you'd be <br />comfortable coming up with a -? <br />BESS: Well, I guess -, I mean, again, I'm flexible. I don't really see the necessity, <br />there certainly isn't a necessity to have an attorney at either of the brainstorming sessions and, you <br />• know, my feeling is that what we could do, if you'd like to, is go ahead and select the attorney at <br />that meeting, that first brainstorming meeting, deal with the Corporation Counsel as our Counsel <br />at that meeting, and then he would be advised if -, the attorney being selected would be advised <br />and would be available for the next meeting. <br />RAY: Okay. <br />BESS: I don't think it's practical to select -. <br />RAY: Yeah. Mr. Wurdeman. <br />WURDEMAN: Yes, sir. <br />BESS: The first. <br />RAY: - Do you think -, would that be a problem as far as having a -, that part of a <br />combined -? <br />WURDEMAN: No. <br />RAY: No. <br />WURDEMAN: I wouldn't think so, and you're authorized to, in discussing personnel <br />matters to be in executive session. <br />RAY: Okay. All right, well let's shoot for that and just do the best we can, okay. <br />IRVINE: I was going to say, we'd have executive session then either before or after <br />the meeting. <br />RAY: Okay. All right. Okay. Moving on in the selection of Commission <br />11 <br />