My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 1999-08-11
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 1999-08-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 11:25:10 AM
Creation date
3/6/2018 2:57:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1999
Meeting date
8/11/1999
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1999-08-11 SP MTG
(Related To)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2000\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• seeking an opinion on something, that if that opinion displeases the Mayor that there is <br />some protection. <br />HERKES: Thank you. <br />RAY: Any other discussion on CHAPTER 2 CORPORATION COUNSEL <br />at this point? Okay, so we're going to work on that last issue and come up with some <br />language and so we'll leave this for now. Thank you, Mr. Wurdeman. <br />BESS: Mr. Chair, we focused on the "special counsel" issue but is there <br />consensus with regard to the housekeeping issue on 5.2.3? Mr. Wurdeman suggested <br />that we add some additional language making it clear about appointment of <br />necessary staff. <br />RAY: Does anybody have any problem with that? No? Okay, so we'll just <br />assume - no let's wait on that as well. Okay, thanks Mr. Wurdeman. <br />To go back to our agenda, New Business A., it says Managing Director Discussion. It <br />probably should have been Council/Manager Form of Government Discussion. In the <br />past couple of months, we've pulled together a fair amount of material and distributed <br />this material to the different Commission members and this is a topic that's come up on <br />• past Charter Commissions and it's one of the items, probably the item of greatest <br />potential impact on the Charter, that we'll be discussing. In regard to that, I'd like Mr. <br />Yuen to just briefly talk about what it would mean logistically, organizationally, to the <br />Charter if we should decide to pursue the Council/Manager form of government as a <br />serious option. <br />YUEN: Just very briefly, it would require a major rewrite of the Charter and <br />I would suggest that if the Commission were to propose a County Manager form of <br />government that it be presented to the voters in the form of a new Charter rather than <br />as 44 amendments to different sections of the Charter. In either case, it would be one <br />vote. If you went with 44 amendments, it would all be voted on at one time but it is <br />such a fundamental and basic change that if it is going to be proposed, it ought to be <br />done as a new Charter. The Charter is presently written in bodies, separation of <br />powers idea, between the Council and the. Mayor that is really largely eliminated under <br />the County Manager form of government where the Manager is directly accountable <br />and chosen, usually, by the Council. Apart from that, there are a lot of specific things <br />that need to be discussed and I think, if the discussion goes further, the members of the <br />Commission will bring up most of them. A very fundamental kind of issue that comes <br />up is whether you have a Mayor, somebody called a Mayor, or not. Many jurisdictions <br />which have a City Manager form of government have a person who is designated as a <br />Mayor and does the ground breakings and the ceremonial functions. Often times it is a <br />person who's either elected - it's an elected position. Generally speaking, the Mayor is <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.