My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 1999-08-25
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 1999-08-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 12:06:34 PM
Creation date
3/6/2018 3:04:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1999
Meeting date
8/25/1999
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1999-08-25 SP MTG
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2000\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• States in 1967 - the Land Reform Act of 1967. <br />So, I think nonpartisan elections are healthy and I would strongly recommend that you <br />consider them. So with those brief remarks, Mr. Chair and Members of the <br />Commission, I stand ready, able and willing to respond to any questions. Anything that <br />is too difficult to respond to, I'll refer to David Arakawa. <br />RAY: Thank you. David, do you want to make any introductory remarks? <br />ARAKAWA: Council Member Felix has to catch a plane so I'll try to keep this <br />brief. I also am honored to be here with you, having worked with the City and County of <br />Honolulu Charter Commission over the past little over a year, I know what type of hard <br />work they put in and what hard work lies in front of you folks. Your dedication and your <br />willingness to serve, I admire. <br />I'm also sitting here next to John Henry Felix who I also respect and admire, and it's <br />great sitting next to one of my clients who's not under fire or under investigation here, <br />and is giving good advice to people. Too often when I sit next to one of my clients, it's <br />trouble but anyway, this is a joy. In fact it's a good opportunity. <br />I'II just quickly go through the nuts and bolts. I think John Henry Felix has gone <br />through the reasons why it was done and some of the effects of it but the 1991-1992 <br />• Charter Commission of the City and County of Honolulu put the issue of nonpartisan <br />voting for City and County Offices, the Mayor and the Council, on the ballot. They did <br />this and they did some research. <br />The first thing they did is a survey of Charter issues of the 100 largest cities in the <br />United States. So they did a survey and that survey is still available but it's dated. It's <br />almost ten years old. Sixty-nine of the largest cities responded and the results on this <br />particular issue - they did it on a number of issues they were looking at - on partisan vs. <br />nonpartisan, they found that 23% of the largest cities had partisan elections and 77% of <br />the largest cities in the United States had nonpartisan elections. <br />The most common type of election, and now we're going to get into some of the nuts <br />and bolts of that, was a type of election we have in Honolulu where the candidates run - <br />however many candidates want to apply for that position, either Mayor or a Council <br />seat, run, and to win outright, you have to have more than 50% of the vote so a good <br />43% of those cities that responded had a system, or type of election, where if you win <br />51%, 50 or more percent of the vote, you're in. <br />The next type of election that we found out there were the two highest vote getters, no <br />matter how much they got, the two highest vote getters run off. 30% of the City and <br />Counties had those types of elections. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.