My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 1999-10-13
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 1999-10-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 12:54:22 PM
Creation date
3/6/2018 3:45:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1999
Meeting date
10/13/1999
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1999-10-13 SP MTG
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2000\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Council meetings and Committee meetings, and that is that beginning in the month of <br />July and continuing through, I believe it was, the month of September, the Council <br />received it's usual Report of Transfers, and these are transfers made in accordance <br />with a portion of the Hawaii County Charter which the Charter affords the Mayor the <br />opportunity to transfer, and not between departments but within departments. And I <br />just wanted to let you know, in three of the transfers, or a number of the transfers that <br />came, that this was subsequent to the approval of the Operating, as well as the CIP <br />Budget; that there were transfers, and this was subsequent to our internal calculations <br />regarding the funded balance, which played a very, very important role in balancing this <br />year's budget, as I'm sure you have read, or at least probably talked to some of us <br />about, over $3,000,000.00 in transfers. Some of the individual transfers were in excess <br />of $500,000.00 each, and 1 stated on the Council floor, so I'm not speaking out of <br />school here, that I felt this was a usurping of the Council's authority. Transfers are <br />really meant to facilitate changes that occur after a budget is adopted but it's not meant <br />to take the place of appropriations, and in my own estimation, there were at least two, <br />possibly four, transfers which were clearly circumventing the Council's wishes not to <br />appropriate funds for certain projects. And I would ask you, please, to consider the <br />possibility of having some language in there, not eliminating the Mayor's right to <br />transfer, should we continue with a Mayor, but to limiting the amount to a reasonable <br />amount, in order to conduct business. I know the Mayor has to make these kinds of <br />decisions, they're very important decisions, and I wouldn't want to take that away from <br />• the Executive Branch of government, but I don't believe they should take the place of <br />the normal appropriation process. And I think you've heard from Mr. Childs with <br />respect to strengthening the authority, responsibility, and if you would call it, the power <br />of the Council. I think he called it 'having a stronger Council', and I believe that this <br />very small change would play a very important role. <br />111 be happy to answer any questions you might have regarding any of my statements. <br />Thank you. <br />RAY: Ms. Herkes. <br />HERKES: Three questions on all three points. I'II take the last one first. <br />Council Manager. If we proposed a Council Manager operation, would you still limit <br />the amount of money that could be transferred in the departments? You'd still suggest <br />that with the Council Manager? <br />TYLER: Yes. Well, I wasn't talking about a Council Manager. I was talking <br />about a County Manager. <br />HERKES: We have changed the wording here. <br />TYLER: Well, I'm sorry. I wasn't privy to that, but we know it in - <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.