Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Department had the power to enact rules to implement the Zoning Code, and <br />this was reenacted in 1999 when the Zoning Code was reenacted. So, from strictly a <br />® legal point of view, you have a little bit of confusion here as to whether the Planning <br />Commission has this power or not. If the Charter had always simply been silent on <br />having this as a power, the Planning Commission certainly would have the power to <br />enact rules and regulations because both the State Legislature and the County Council <br />could give them this power on their own, and they have giventhemthis power through <br />ordinances and State taws that have been put in place. So, that was the purpose <br />behind putting this back in the Charter, was to eliminate any confusion, or any doubt, <br />that the Planning Commission might have this power. On further review, and I wrote a <br />letter to the Charter Commissioners, I don't think it's necessary to do this. I think the <br />Planning Commission has the power without it being in the Charter because I don't <br />think the intent of the 1998 Charter Amendment was to forbid the Planning Commission <br />from having the power to enact rules and regulations. I think it was the intent to not <br />have it be mandatory anymore because it used to say they 'shall' enact rules and <br />regulations. They just, basically, took out that part of it. But I've spent a little time <br />trying to - I wrote, perhaps, too long a letter to the Charter Commissioners going <br />through all of this, but that's, basically, the explanation of what was trying to be done by <br />putting this back in the Charter. <br />• <br />• <br />SCARR: Chris, our major objection is that the Planning Commission is <br />appointed by the Mayor, not appointed by the County Council, and that there is very <br />little local input sought or received by the Planning Commission. We have, many of us <br />in this room, testified many times before the Planning Commission and been ignored <br />over and over and over again. <br />RAY: I understand that. That's really a separate issue from what has <br />been proposed as far as the Charter Amendment. I just wanted Chris to clarify that, <br />explain it. We are going to take it off so I hope that pleases you, but I'm saddened that <br />folks don't take the time to really understand how the process really works. So, I just <br />wanted to have him speak to that issue again, and we certainly understand your <br />concerns in regard to other issues regarding the Planning Commission. <br />SCARR: Thank you. <br />RAY: The next person to testify is Del Pranke. <br />PRANKE: My name is Del Pranke. I live in Pahoa. I'm really sorry you made <br />that last statement, Mr. Ray, because those of us who don't understand what's going on <br />have made an effort to understand, and sometimes the legalities are not that easy for <br />non -lawyers to understand, but some of us have made an attempt to understand. <br />RAY: I agree with you, Del. I was on the Council that voted to delete this <br />in the last Charter Amendment and I, obviously, didn't understand at that time, and that <br />was my direct responsibility. <br />4 <br />