My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 2000-05-10
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 2000-05-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 12:23:32 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 12:37:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
2000
Meeting date
5/10/2000
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 2000-05-10 SP MTG
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2000\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
chance to vote on that. <br />All right, now I'd like to go to some of the specific items. I would say I'm not in favor of <br />the at -large, as I stated last time. <br />The Managing Director. I don't know that it's stated but I would think he should have <br />the same professional qualifications as a County Manager would have, though I would <br />prefer that there be, in fact, a County Manager. <br />On Article V, Section 5-1.2, I would just suggest a small change of wording. It says <br />'the mayor may serve for more than two terms but shall not serve more than two <br />consecutive full terms'. I'd suggest changing that 'may serve for more than two terms, <br />but shall not be elected to more than two consecutive terms'. Conceivably one day, <br />you might get someone unscrupulous who might resign just before the end of the term, <br />as it's worded now, and run again for re-election. That would not be in the sense of <br />this. So if we just said `shall not be elected to more than two consecutive full terms', I <br />think that would take care of that. <br />13-3, Appointments. I want to say, again, proper professional degrees are needed. <br />As written, I think maybe, the terms there such as `proper investigation ' and 'related <br />fields' are so ambiguous that they don't mean anything. They're too broad and I think <br />maybe one wants to say a little more clearly what constitutes `proper investigation' and <br />`related fields'. That's done somewhat for the Planning Director but I'm a little taken <br />aback by the term 'geography' as a qualification. It might be nice if they can tell you <br />where the Holy Roman Empire used to be in a map of the world, and the Ottoman <br />Empire, but it's not clear to me what that has to do with running a Planning Office. An <br />appointment in Hilo would probably be able to tell us.that the Grand Canyon is not what <br />he reaches back and finds, but I don't see that as relevant, again, to running the <br />Planning Department. <br />RAY: Actually, the field of geography is quite broad. I studied Coastal <br />Geography when I was in college, which was actually directly applicable to planning <br />issues in this County. <br />BLANN: <br />might say — <br />Okay, it's not what comes to my mind by 'geography'. Geology, I <br />HERKES: Mr. Ray, could I ask a question? <br />BLANN: Please. <br />HERKES: I went through about 15 different Charters, or documents, from <br />different entities on the mainland and across this island, and I looked for language for <br />Managing Directors, for qualifications. I didn't find a lot of language that pleased me, or <br />that I felt comfortable with. Do you have any specific language that you could propose? <br />I mean, like five years experience, and those kinds of broad things, are fine, but they <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.