My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHC 2000-05-10
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHC 2000-05-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 12:23:32 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 12:37:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
2000
Meeting date
5/10/2000
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 2000-05-10 SP MTG
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\2000\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
General. If there are three or more candidates running for a particular office, they will <br />be voted on in the first election, and the top two will always go on to the General to be <br />run off, no matter how many more votes one gets than the other. <br />SANTANGELO: I'm going to speak against the amendment simply because, again, <br />there's been an awful lot of discussion about money, and I know the 15%, and Sue, we <br />both know that in a Presidential election, you get a lot more voters. It goes up and <br />down, and it's really up to the voters to get off their can. And having been through <br />these elections, I know what it's like to go through a Primary and then a General, and if <br />the solution is there, if there's,a majority winner which is what we haven't had in a while <br />for a lot of things, in the Primary then let it be and I would vote against this amendment <br />and go for the original as we had it. And that's simply a friendly suggestion though. <br />RAY: <br />hand. <br />Further discussion? All in favor of the amendment, raise your right <br />HANDS RAISED: Commissioners Herkes, Irvine, Kurozawa. <br />RAY: Opposed? <br />HANDS RAISED: Commissioners Alonzo, Bess, Higashi, Ray, Santangelo, <br />Yoshiyama. <br />RAY: Okay, the amendment fails to carry. We're at the main motion in <br />regard to a non-partisan election as we had originally voted on, and I think everybody <br />•. understands that. Yes sir, you'd like to speak to the main motion? <br />YOSHIYAMA: No, I want to make an amendment. I'd like to propose an <br />amendment that we delete our proposed Section (e) relating to at -large Council <br />election. <br />IRVINE: Second. <br />RAY: All in favor of that amendment, raise your right hand. <br />HANDS RAISED: All Commissioners. <br />SANTANGELO: I'd like to speak to the main motion, just real quick. As a <br />Republican, I've had my Party beat me to death on not supporting non-partisan, and <br />frankly, that's probably why I am supporting it. Having served this County, and along <br />with you, John, as a Republican, I felt like that had very little to do with what I was as <br />an elected official. I felt like once you're elected, you are there to serve all the people: <br />Whether they voted or not; whether they're registered or not; whether they're male, <br />female, child or adult; on a County level. On a State and a Federal level, you're dealing <br />in some very different territory that's really working in our lives on a different level, but <br />County, or the services, it's a different type of quality of life, and I firmly believe that <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.